Perhaps you’ve lost interest in debating because it appears that you’re unaware of basic facts about the issue, because you’re making assertions without making fact-based arguments to support them, and because you refuse to see that logically, what Mr. Reagan signed in 1967 is little different from what most pro-lifers would like to see in 2007.
“If you think Romney is being deceptive, then just say so. Dragging Reagan’s record into it is a distraction and proves far less than you assert.”
I’ve said long and loud that I suspect that Mr. Romney is a liar. It is HE who dragged Mr. Reagan into the conversation, not me. I’d like him to leave Mr. Reagan out of it, as to me, it’s evidence of deception.
I wish that Mr. Romney had turned out to be an honest “convert” to the cause. But it appears to me that he is a deceiver. Part of the evidence is that he lies about Mr. Reagan.
sitetest
You’re deeply in denial about Reagan’s actual record. Go ahead and pretend he was always pro-life, even as he signed one of the earliest pro-abortion bills in the country.