Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest
It would be better if he just kept his comments about the subject to: “I was a filthy pro-abort. I was wrong. Now, I’m pro-life.”

Can you cite Reagan's speech where he ever did that, despite having signed a key piece of abortion legislation (which Romney never did)? Without claiming to be “personally pro-life but...” or claiming that Ronald Reagan - who, in 1967, was as pro-life as most pro-lifers are today - was “pro-choice.”

You're the one trying to drag Ronnie into this in some big way. Not Romney.

You're putting words in his mouth.
223 posted on 05/10/2007 6:33:18 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Election Math For Dummies: GOP รท Rudi = Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: George W. Bush
Dear George W. Bush,

“You’re the one trying to drag Ronnie into this in some big way. Not Romney.

“You’re putting words in his mouth.”

I don’t think so. Did you actually read the article starting this thread?

He directly compares himself to Mr. Reagan:

“He added: ‘But if you go the other direction, as I have and as Ronald Reagan did and (former Illinois Rep.) Henry Hyde and (former president) George Herbert Walker Bush, it’s like the media can’t get enough of it: “Oh, well, why did you change?”’ “

In that Mr. Reagan was never, like Mr. Romney, a pro-abort, I take issue with the comparison. Mr. Romney is NOT like Ronald Reagan in this way.


sitetest

225 posted on 05/10/2007 6:42:45 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson