To: Nachum
2 posted on
05/09/2007 3:38:47 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Rush is a “shock jock”? Rush is about as much of "shock jock" as the Guardian is a conservative "newspaper." (bird cage liner?)
22 posted on
05/09/2007 3:54:49 PM PDT by
CDB
(The Democrats "support the troops," in the best PT Barnum tradition)
To: BenLurkin
Rush is a “shock jock”? He is to a Liberal. The truth is always a shock to them!
23 posted on
05/09/2007 3:55:53 PM PDT by
Bommer
(Global Warming: The only warming phenomena that occurs in the Summer and ends in the Winter!)
To: BenLurkin
Shocking!! I’m shocked, appalled, and if I’m Johnny Cochran, dead!
Oh the horror of it all.
Please, no RUSH to judgment. I’m not Mark the looneytune Lane.
To: BenLurkin
They can never get the difference between “Bible thumpers”, “Bible bashers” (UK slang only) , and “Bible belters” straight, either.
To: BenLurkin
I couldn’t find a place at the Guardian site to leave comments about this article, which leaves me wondering if they intended it to be that way. How convenient that they plant all their lies and innuendo but don’t allow anyone to call them on it or submit corrections.
33 posted on
05/09/2007 4:09:10 PM PDT by
kalee
(The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
To: BenLurkin
Rush is a “shock jock”? Are you as shocked as I am?
I would call it verbosity.
To: BenLurkin
Rush is a “shock jock”? Sure. To leftists it is very shocking to be made fun of.
42 posted on
05/09/2007 4:22:38 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
To: BenLurkin
The British don’t hear him on a regular basis, so they get their distinctions fuzzy. Rush is a lippman, not a winchell.
54 posted on
05/09/2007 5:17:36 PM PDT by
GAB-1955
(being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the Kingdom of Heaven....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson