Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

"The oldest archaeological find of paper employed as a writing medium for writing dates to about AD 110 and our major source of early paper documents is, not suprisingly, the desiccating sands of the Tarim Basin."
Ah, I see. Thanks. But it does not mention that a Tocharian script was written on the paper, let alone Tocharian A. If Tocharian A was really written on this paper, even a 110 CE paper, many in Indo-European linguistic studies would be a-flurry with excitement at finding examples of Tocharian script that predate known Tocharian writing by almost half a millennium. By 110 CE, though, the Han Dynasty had a well-established presence in the Tarim Basin, so it is quite likely that this paper was inscribed with ancient Hanzi.

Besides, Mallory and Mair technically claim this as the earliest discovery of paper used as a writing medium, not of paper per se - which according to the third source I quoted earlier is much older than 110 CE. Nor do they mention that it was found with any of the mummies. When you wrote that "the oldest paper ever found was found with this area", I thought you were talking about the oldest paper of any use, not just writing paper.

Actually, even the claim that the first paper writing dates to 110 CE no longer holds, because the second source I quoted earlier mentions a discovery of paper dating to 8 BCE in an ancient Han garrison, with specifically Chinese character script written on it.

This would mean that, regardless of what script was written on the 110 CE paper, the oldest discovery of paper used as a writing medium dates to 8 BCE, and the oldest paper writing was in Han Chinese characters.
27 posted on 05/11/2007 2:43:56 AM PDT by PuTiDaMo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: PuTiDaMo
"When you wrote that "the oldest paper ever found was found with this area", I thought you were talking about the oldest paper of any use, not just writing paper."

I had meant to imply that too. Apparently I was wrong, my apologies...I pride myself on being correct in such matters. Albeit, I still think I read that somewhere and if I run across it again I'll make note where and notify you. Until I can cite a reliable source, I'll stop saying it.

34 posted on 05/11/2007 10:47:58 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson