Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: Tour navy's £1.2bn super sub (paper given exclusive look at HMS Astute)
The Sun (U.K.) ^ | May 9, 2007 | TOM NEWTON DUNN

Posted on 05/09/2007 11:25:04 AM PDT by Stoat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Commanding Officer HMS Astute Future Submarines Submarine Service Operations and Support Royal Navy

Commanding Officer

Commander M J D Walliker OBE Royal Navy

Mike Walliker was born in Wimbledon in 1964, and entered Britannia Royal Naval College in September 1982 after being educated at Oundle School.  Following initial training ashore and four months in the frigate HMS Londonderry, he went to Birmingham University to read French. During the university vacations he spent time in the Hong Kong Squadron and several weeks in both a US and a French warship. On graduation in 1987, he completed his fleet training in the frigate HMS Jupiter before volunteering for the Submarine Service.

Between 1989 and 1996 he served in a number of sea appointments including the conventional submarine HMS Odin as the Signals Officer and the nuclear submarines HMS Triumph and Talent as the Navigating and Operations Officer. From 1990 to 1992 he served at the Fleet headquarters in Northwood as Flag Lieutenant to Flag Officer Submarines.

Commander Walliker completed the Submarine Command Course, the Perisher, in January 1997 and was appointed as the Executive Officer of HMS Turbulent. During his two years onboard, the submarine completed a refit, a period of operational training and a deployment to the Gulf region.

In April 1999, he returned to the Staff at Northwood for a short appointment as the Special Operations Officer.  He was promoted to Commander in December 1999 and took command of HMS Tireless in Gibraltar in August 2000.

During his 28 months in command, the submarine underwent a lengthy nuclear repair in Gibraltar, a work-up and a deployment to the Atlantic Underwater Test and Evaluation Centre off the eastern seaboard of the United States.  During his final months onboard, the submarine conducted an operational patrol.

In January 2003, Commander Walliker was appointed as the Commanding Officer of the Submarine Command Course (Teacher) for two years, after which he took up an appointment in the Directorate of Naval Resources and Plans in the Ministry of Defence.  He was awarded the OBE in the Queen's Birthday Honours List in June 2003.

He was appointed to command HMS Astute, the first of a new generation of hunter killer submarines in 2007, joining the submarine in build, in Barrow-in-Furness. 

He is married to Charlotte, a former WRNS Officer. They have two young children, Lucy and Jonty and live in South Devon. His interests are varied but include travel and sport. He is a Liveryman of the Worshipful Company of the Makers of Playing Cards and a member of MCC.
 

Astute attack submarine

 

Astute attack

Britain's nuclear deterrent is to remain with the Royal Navy whose latest attack submarine will enter service late in 2006.

 

 
   

ONCE THE DECISION had been made that the Royal Navy should bear the nuclear weapons of the UK, the submarine took on an important role. While the Royal Air Force and the Royal Navy were tasked with nuclear capability, it now rested solely with the senior service. The presence of submarines has never been less than significant during their 100-year history with the Royal Navy. During World War II the submarine service came into its own and since that time boats have become increasingly larger and faster and now the latest name in the long line of famous classes is Astute. Three have been ordered with a possible three more to follow. Laid down by Vickers at Barrow-in-Furness on 31 January 2001 the first S.119, HMS Astute, is now being constructed by BAE Systems that took over the contract. The second Astute Class submarine will be S.120 HMS Ambush and she will be followed by S.121 HMS Artful. It was expected that the first of the type would enter service in mid-2005 but this date has slipped to late 2006.

BAE Systems has stated that the main reason for the delay has been lateness in completion of the design. This is an extremely complex process involving the integration of a staggering number of engineering disciplines and technical requirements, including selection of and contracting with a wide range of equipment suppliers. While the company accepts that this adds to the delay, for such a major engineering programme with safety-critical issues and challenging cost targets for build and in-service operations, it is always better to sort out these issue at the design stage because failure to do so could cause even greater delay in the build phase.

There may be a small delay with Ambush and Artful also, but everyone involved is working hard to minimise any impact on these boats, and they are still predicted to enter service in 2007 and 2009 respectively. Attack submarines originate from early studies of nuclear-powered vessels in the UK during 1946, long before other nations had considered such a propulsion system. Research and development in the war-ravaged United Kingdom was soon overtaken by the mighty United States and it was not until 1960 that the first British nuclear submarine was launched. HMS Dreadnought was a fully operational attack submarine and served for 20 years from 1963 before being decommissioned in 1983 and placed in store.

The success of Dreadnought led to other attack submarines in the Valiant, Swiftsure and Trafalgar class vessels. Currently five Swiftsure and seven Trafalgar class submarines are in service. In the former category are HMS Splendid, to be retired in 2003, HMS Sovereign, to go in 2005, HMS Spartan in 2006, HMS Superb in 2007 and HMS Sceptre in 2008. Trafalgar class submarines successfully replaced Valiant class vessels as they came on stream from 1983 to 1991. Built by Vickers at Barrow-in-Furness, Trafalgar essentially was a much-improved Swiftsure design, with better underwater capability and endurance. They are also quieter, an advantage achieved by covering both the pressure hull and all the outer surfaces with conformal anechoic noiseReduction tiles. Power is supplied by a Rolls-Royce PWR.1 pressurised-water nuclear reactor, two GEC steam turbines, two Paxman diesel alternators, one shaft and one pump-jet propulsor. Naturally, as the requirement for submarine operations has changed in recent years so the Royal Navy has considered the future of its fleet.

Following extensive studies the replacement of the Swiftsure class with a totally new design was deemed to be necessary. However, by 1990 it had become clear that unit costs for the proposed SSN-20 W Class would be in the order of £400m. When this was added to R&D costs and proposed reductions in defence spending were taken into account, the project was cancelled in 1991. Meanwhile, the study into the Batch 2 Trafalgar class submarines continued and it became apparent that further development of the Trafalgar class was the way forward. To differentiate between the Trafalgar class, now termed Batch 1 Trafalgar class, and the new variant, the name Astute class was chosen.

Astute is the biggest and most powerful attack submarine to be built for the Royal Navy and, under the Smart Acquisition Programme, is being built roughly one-fifth more quickly than earlier boats. It will have lower running costs and a smaller ship's company of 108 plus 12 officers. Although Astute will be 30 per cent larger than the Trafalgar class, the larger hull means it will be easier and cheaper to build and maintain. From day one the submarine will be capable of operating Tomahawk III cruise missiles as well as more conventional weapons. Astute also will carry SSM sub-Harpoon fired from tubes and Marconi Spearfish torpedoes or mines. She will be fitted with six weapons tubes and will have increased firepower compared with the present attack-class submarines.

FOSM Rear Admiral Stevens commented, "The services of SSN (Ship Submersible Nuclear) community has made a decisive break away from its cold-war emphasis on anti-submarine warfare (ASW) to embrace the Navy's new operational concept of Maritime Contributions to Joint Operations. The challenge now is to realise the full potential of the SSN across its wider range of taskings - operations in direct support of surface forces are becoming a far more important part of the submarine services operations."

"The introduction of new secure communications links will provide the improved connectability essential for operating in conjunction with other task force units. Advances in technological areas of digitisation, miniaturisation and processing of information gathered, will enable the submarine (Astute) to become an increasingly valuable asset in covert intelligence gathering operations."

HMS Astute is 97m long and displaces 7,200 tonnes, powered by a Rolls-Royce PWR-2 nuclear reactor, the vessel has an endurance of eight to nine years and a maximum submerged speed of 32kts. Conventional power will be supplied by two GEC turbines. To enhance the capability of the new submarine, navigational radar will be the Kelvin Hughes Type 1007. The combat data system will be the BAE SEMA SMCS and weapons control the Dowty Tactical Control System SAFS 3 FCS. Marconi Ferranti Type 2076 integrated suite supplies the sonar. Countermeasures will include two SSE Mk 10 launchers for Type 2066 and 2071 decoys and ECM Racal UAP 3 Passive Intercept.

The Astute class also will have fully reelable towed arrays rather than the clip-on type now in use. Other equipment is to be finalised and upgrades will be announced during the building programme. China, Russia, France and the US have SSN programmes, some quite advanced. However, because of a lack of funds many Russian programmes have been curtailed. Five of their improved Akula-Class SSNs were laid down but only three were completed and two partially completed vessels were leased to the Indian Navy during 2002. One of China's Han Class SSNs made headlines in 1994 when it approached the carrier USS Kitty Hawk in the Yellow Sea in October 1994. China is now busy working with a Russian design team on a new, improved vessel to replace the ageing Han Class.

Probably the most famous SSN is USS Nautilus. Commissioned in 1954 and retired in 1980 it showed the way. The current US SSN programme is well advanced with the Seawolf class, the latest in a long line. Twenty-nine boats were considered, 12 were ordered and now the figure is just three - two of which have been launched and the third to be completed in 2004. Unlike Astute the Seawolf carries around 50 weapons including Tomahawk, Harpoon and Mk 48 ADCAP torpedoes. Development of the Seawolf class has led to the Virginia class, a new programme now underway with 30 boats on order.

Following development problems, the first French SSN did not join the fleet until 1983. However, the Rubis and Amethyste classes have operated from their Toulon base for many years and have been subjected to major update rebuilding programmes. France has announced a new SSN programme, the new Baracuda class will enter service from 2010, but details are sketchy and apart from the fact that this new class will be larger than Rubis/Amethyste and smaller than Astute, little is known.

We have noted that India has on lease two Russian-built SSNs and are known to be developing a vessel of their own but details are not available and neither can reports that Brazil has, or will have, an attack-submarine programme in place. What is clear is that the requirement for such a vessel is more apparent than ever before and with programmes from the US, France and the UK underway, the SSN has an assured place - but at what cost? It is widely known that all the programmes have slipped mainly because of development parameters and available funds. None of the countries mentioned has unlimited resources, even the United States is feeling the need for economies as it attempts to police the world and to deal with a slipping economy at home.


1 posted on 05/09/2007 11:25:09 AM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; xzins; SandRat; Cannoneer; Ragtime Cowgirl; stockpirate; Darksheare

Seapower Ping :-)


2 posted on 05/09/2007 11:29:39 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Submarine ping :-)


3 posted on 05/09/2007 11:30:50 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

WOW


4 posted on 05/09/2007 11:31:09 AM PDT by DungeonMaster (Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Totally awesome!!


5 posted on 05/09/2007 11:31:26 AM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Room for 11 “passengers” - heh. I wonder why they quoted that word.


6 posted on 05/09/2007 11:32:14 AM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

How do they compare to our best?


7 posted on 05/09/2007 11:35:33 AM PDT by Lazamataz (JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I think she needs a few more masts, snorkles, and periscopes on the sail.


8 posted on 05/09/2007 11:36:09 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
How do they compare to our best?

Hopefully some FR sub experts will drop by shortly, as they would be able to give you a far better answer than myself.  Although I love learning about the technologies involved, I haven't served on a sub and so I wouldn't be speaking with any sort of authority.

9 posted on 05/09/2007 11:40:17 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Our “best” is classified, besides nobody would believe it anyway.


10 posted on 05/09/2007 11:41:42 AM PDT by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
I think she needs a few more masts, snorkles, and periscopes on the sail.

It certainly is quite a 'forest' up there, isn't it?  :-)

What was it that the wolf said in Hansel and Gretel?...."all the better to see you with, my pretty"

11 posted on 05/09/2007 11:44:11 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Okay, gang, help me out here.

"Astute?"

What happened to names like Conqueror, Tireless, Perisher, Splendid, Dreadnought, and Sceptre?

"Astute?" How hath the mighty fallen?

12 posted on 05/09/2007 11:59:47 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paddles
What happened to names like Conqueror, Tireless, Perisher, Splendid, Dreadnought, and Sceptre?

From the posted Global-Defence.org article:

The second Astute Class submarine will be S.120 HMS Ambush and she will be followed by S.121 HMS Artful.

It appears to reflect a focus on high technology and stealth rather than brute power.  It could be PR or PC, to create an image of a "friendlier" navy....to an outside observer, it could easily look that way.

I tend to prefer the 'brute power' and "cudgel of death" themed names, but the Royal Navy didn't ask me when they were in the process of naming the vessels   :-)

13 posted on 05/09/2007 12:12:51 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

nice post. thks


14 posted on 05/09/2007 12:19:07 PM PDT by beebuster2000 (choice is not not peace or war, but small war now, or big war later masquerading as peace now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Go UK!

Astute - Ambush - I love the names.

15 posted on 05/09/2007 12:39:00 PM PDT by bluetone006 (Peace - or I guess war if given no other option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bluetone006
I’m looking forward to HMS Cheeky.
16 posted on 05/09/2007 1:05:12 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000
nice post. thks

You're quite welcome and I'm delighted that you've found the articles to be worthwhile   :-)

I do believe that Admiral Lord Nelson would be beaming with pride for the modern Royal Navy, fitted out as it is with such magnificent warships and with such fine sailors and Officers.

As to the Sun article, although I'm accustomed to seeing primarily idiotic celebrity gossip on it's pages they have been a tireless and enthusiastic supporter of the troops, and every now and then they have a FANTASTIC article that shouldn't be missed, mixed in among the worthless sludge   :-)

A few examples of 'don't miss' Sun articles:

Brown hails Bush's war (Great Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer delivers glowing endorsement)

Gongs for Britain's brave(Heroic Army Captain defuses bomb by hand under fire, awarded George Medal)

Great Britain Boffins to crack al-Qaeda (Codebreaking effort launched, much like 'Enigma' of WW2)

Great Britain Brown £20bn nuke pledge (Promises massive new nuke arsenal, upgrade)

Great Britain Don't Dare mess with us (HMS Daring billed as world's most advanced warship)

Great Britain Fallen hero set for VC honour (Inspirational story of heroism and dedication)

Great Britain Fury at Churchill statue (Former PM and beloved hero is in a straightjacket)

Great Britain Medal for hero minefield medic (George Medal)

Great Britain Remember them at 11 o'clock (Touching story for Remembrance Day)

I could have been anyone (Reporter breezes through airport security w-o being asked to lift veil)

 

17 posted on 05/09/2007 1:25:14 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

‘I tend to prefer the ‘brute power’ and “cudgel of death” themed names, but the Royal Navy didn’t ask me when they were in the process of naming the vessels :-)’

The RN has always named it’s craft with reference to their role.

The UsS Arleigh Burke, SS Beaver State, USNS Big Horn and USS Charlotte are hardly going to have the enemy soiling their undies! :D


18 posted on 05/09/2007 1:47:38 PM PDT by britemp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: britemp

All very true....the US Navy didn’t ask me for my opinion on vessel names either, unfortunately :-)


19 posted on 05/09/2007 1:55:35 PM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

BTTT


20 posted on 05/09/2007 6:00:32 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson