Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

I see you use the big L when not taking Libertarians seriously. Most who consider themselves libertarians dont necessarily follow that party’s line.


49 posted on 05/09/2007 7:26:30 AM PDT by Vaquero (time again for the Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero
I see you use the big L when not taking Libertarians seriously. Most who consider themselves libertarians dont necessarily follow that party’s line.

They do that all the time. Notice that Libertarians weren't even the topic of the article. The hyper-moralists just have to get their cheap shots in.

67 posted on 05/09/2007 7:52:29 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Ben Franklin, we tried but we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero; ClearCase_guy
I see you use the big L when not taking Libertarians seriously. Most who consider themselves libertarians dont necessarily follow that party’s line.

True, in my case.

I say that prostitution is not addressed by the Constitution, and so is most properly considered a matter for the several states to regulate or criminalize as they see fit. Personally, though I believe prostitution ought to remain illegal, I also believe that law enforcement agencies have bigger fish to fry most of the time, and rightly so.

It's a crime, but a relatively small one in the grand scheme.

97 posted on 05/09/2007 8:20:10 AM PDT by Oberon (What does it take to make government shrink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson