Jim, Bob J claims the drug-runner was shot in the back, but that’s not accurate. He was shot in the hip and the bullet more or less traversed his lower abdomen.
IOW, he was turned sideways at the time the bullet hit him. If he had been running away, but then stopped and turned 90 degrees and aimed a handgun at the BPA, that bullet path would make sense. After that, he ran across the border, so nobody knows for certain whether he had a gun at the time or not. Nobody.
*************
I thought I had read that here on FR, but I can't cite a link.
You must be getting your info from WND as well.
The bullet entered his left buttock, smashed into his pelvis, severed his urethra, exited his left leg and lodged in his right thigh. Here is a good example of how supporters twist the facts.
The doctor who testified said the entry wound was consistent with a man who was turned to the left. He also testified the entrywound was consistent with a man who is running in which the hips twist to the left and right during each stride.
They never mention the second part. They pick and choose the evidence they want you to hear.
BTW - The BPA’s testified they were aiming for the back of his torso on each and every shot. They were shooting at his back and they were shooting to kill.