[tacticalogic]

Good bye- you’ve made it abundantly clear that you can’t follow along and will consistently make crap up as you go along. Come on back when you’ve actually followed the links and seen for yourself the evidences- Writing evberythign off simply because you’re too lazy to follow along and read for yourself just shows lack of sensibility

Actually I made the mistake of wasting the time it took to follow one of them, and it didn't amount to squat. I saw for myself, and it was pathetic.

[CottShop]

Yup- major symposiums that included the worlds top scientists expressing their dissastisfaction with evolution through common descent doesn’t amount to squat. Scientists showing the mathematical impossibilities of common descent is squat. Scientists searching for a new method, one that ISN’T riddled with impossibilities and brainwashed into our kids minds (yet) like the old broken model is, is nothing but squat. You’re right- no sense actually following the links and discovering that the silly notion that common descent is a universally accepted and undisputed fact isn’t as strong and ‘settled’ as many evolution advocates would lead us 56to believe. You’re right-

Reading a statement from a top evolution scientist that stated The time has come for biology to go beyond the Doctrine of Common Descent" doesn't back up my ORIGINAL statement to Stultis that there are indeed scientists that have problems with the model of common descent. How silly of me to think that this would have been the case- Posting that statement by a scientist was so far off base concerning what I had said to Stultis that it amounted to squat and was a waste of your precious time- By golly, all your huffing and puffing has proved that there aren’t scientists who have problems with the model of common descent.

Shallowness and laziness rule the day- no sense bothering putting much effort into finding out that this is the case- much better to make false accusations against someone WHO provides the evidence thaN To actually be thorough enough to be accurate when responding- good job!

As I said tactic- when you decide you want to argue sensibly, instead of throwing out asinine and faLSE accusations- and when you decide you want to kick up the coutner arguments beyond a foot stamping gradeschool denial of the obvious points being made, and when you decide you want to actually argue ligitmate points instead of making crap up and insinuating I've said somethign I haven't just so you can keep on arguing non issues, why then You just let me know. Your silly little round and round games are amusing, but grow old quick