What an odd thing to post in light of your post 214 to this thread. It contains this statement:
3 - SCIENTISTS SPEAK AGAINST EVOLUTIONhttp://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/sci-ev/sci_vs_ev_23.htm
“We cannot expect to explain cellular evolution if we stay locked in the classical Darwinian mode of thinking,” Woese says. “The time has come for biology to go beyond the Doctrine of Common Descent.”
“Neither it nor any variation of it can capture the tenor, the dynamic, the essence of the evolutionary process that spawned cellular organization,”
Perhaps someone tampered with your post? Because otherwise “SCIENTISTS SPEAK AGAINST EVOLUTION” and the Woese quote salad would give the disinterested reader the idea that you were trying to give exactly that impression.
By the way, Woese is talking about cells, which aren’t species.
And just for the record- I could[sic] care less what Weose beleives[sic] about lateral gene transference- it’s all biological garbage-
Which is why you bothered posting and linking to it.
And how is it you’re qualified to judge what he’s saying?
…if you wish to keep deceitfully misrepresenting what I’ve said in hopes of derailing the truth about what I DID say, then perhaps it would be better for you to start a new thread relevent [sic] to your points because quite frankly, they have absolutely NO rleevence[sic] to what was being discussed here …
You don’t need me to misrepresent what you post; you’re doing a fine job all by yourself.
Did I say scientists have problems beleivign[sic] in ANY forms ofd[sic] evolution? Nope- Got that? Understand it well becausde[sic] what I’m abotu[sic] to say is apparently difficult to understand judging by the responses of some here to my points- I said “Some Evolutionsits[sic] have problem with the model of common descent” - please let me know what it is that is throwing you for a loop concerning that statement. Next time you jump into a conversation late in the discussion- be more civil and you’ll receive a more civil respoinsde[sic] explaining your obvious error.
It’s rally too tedious to keep this up. Your idea of “evolutionists who have a problem with common descent” appears to be anyone trying to figure out how the process works. Your attempts are beyond silly.
I realize now that the depths of your ignorance are far too deep for me to attempt to even attempt to plumb. Post anything you like. I’ll do the same.
Did you have fun standing on your little high horse pointing out all the spelling mistakes as though spotting htem were an important victory?
I see from the rest of your post you’ve dug your heels in and decided to continue on with your gradeschool arguing. I already explained about woese- If you can’t figure it out- perhaps you can have someone who is a little better at understanding htigns over on DC give you a hand with that
Woese is talking about Cells? Egads, and here I thought Cells meant banana peels- thanks for pointing that out- Cells aren't species? Doh- Why thanks- I hadn't realized that cells were the foundations of the whole lateral gene transference system Woese speeks about, nor that he was implying “The time has come for biology to go beyond the Doctrine of Common Descent.” I figured he meant that the time had come to glom onto common descent while at the same time voicing his hypothesis about an absolutely and completely different model of evolution. And here I figured he was ignant- you've shown me the errors of my ways. I see clearly now that he was smart enough to realize that when one system breaks down due to biological impossibilities, that it's time to move on to another perhaps more viable hypothesis.
[Your idea of “evolutionists who have a problem with common descent” appears to be anyone trying to figure out how the process works]
What a retarded statement. The evidences I provided are more than enough to dispel that foolish nonsense
[It’s rally [sic] too tedious to keep this up.]
Good- buh bye. I figured it would be too much work for you to follow along and post honestly. Run on back to DC- they miss the backslapping and camaraderie whenever threads maligning creationists (or cretards as you like to so maturely call us) crop 7p.