Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Actually no we can’t agree because it IS relevent to what Stultis claimed. Regardless of how much importance it is in a singular context when wiegghed against the numerous other evidences I showed indicating that there are indeed scientists who have problems with the model of darwin’s proposed hypothesis of eovlution.

Stultis seems to have made the mistake of arguing in absolutes. All absolutes, particularly with regards to people's opinions, can be proven false by the anomolous or trivial. You get credit for having done so.

255 posted on 05/13/2007 7:24:05 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

mmm yes, it’s quite trivial that scientists are beginning to expose the truth that evolution via the old model is biologically impossible- you’re right- trivial trivial trivial. The truth is always trivial when covering up a dirty little secret


256 posted on 05/13/2007 10:19:00 AM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

but fret not, shows like pbs NG the Discovery channel, animal planet, and places like the smithsonian and our public schools will all work in unison to keep the dirty little secret neatly tucked away from the general public and from the minds of our inquiring children, and forums will continue to berate and malign anyone that doubts evolution for even a second and points out the problems. So the secret is safe- fret not


257 posted on 05/13/2007 10:24:23 AM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson