I checked out just one of your quotes; it did not support your argument.
tacticalogic did the same with another quote, with the same results.
When it comes to research, you have shown yourself to be untrustworthy. When you post a quote, it appears that we can't trust it until we research it for ourselves to see what it really says.
If you were a scientist, your career would be over.
Obviously apologetics has a different standard.
lol Bzzzzzt wrong- all you managed to do was show that ONE person wasn’t 100% certain one way or the other and you IGNORED- per usual- the rest of what was posted and you glommed onto a moronic argument by another as your ‘proof’ against everythign that was posted- I’d say your career as a field researcher should be over for playing the little games, but alas- the bulk of careers in those fields do the exact same thing and you’re in like-company apparently.
Do please show where the scientists didn’t have doubts in ALL those meetings presented- until you can- my assertions stand solid and yours are nothign but hot air! per usual. The magic wand of dismissal doesn’t negate anything I’ve said abotu those meetings nor does the fact that one person in that list not being sure one way or the other as much as you’d like to blanket-discredit the whole lot. But we’re used to having the magic wand of dismissal waved whenever the evidences don’t suit the liberal bias of intellectually not so honest arguers. Your argument tactics don’t rise to the level of apologetics sir. They’re mired in blind dogma and silly little symantics games.