of course you don’t- you can find the quote and learn about the chicago meeting, the new york meeting, and the philidelphia meeting of top sicentists in their fields who had problems with the conventionally held notion of evolution by going to the link I posted- sorry- but your predicted ‘it’s quote-mining and therefore not valid’ accusation won’t hold up when so many scientists ALL voiced their problems with evolution at those meetings You might launch a weak argument if only one or two people had voiced problems, and could I suppose suggest that someone had an agenda by only quoting certain segments of a single scientists statements, but the quotes themselves leave no doubt as to the problems and doubts the scientists had and went on record as stating. You can alos investigate the numerous statements in the other links as well if you like- but I’m, sorry, but attacking singular statements hoping to divert attention and undermine the whole won’t cut it here when there are so many. That might work on less intellectually honest forums, but not this one.
I’m reading about the New York meeting. There’s one quote by someone who was there (the one you provided), and two more by someone else, apparently written later, who it doesn’t make clear whether they were actually there or not. That’s it.