[To see what scientists are really doing you have to read journals such as those listed below.]
No- to see what scientists are doing you need only look as far as programs like national geographic, the discovery channel, PBS, etc etc etc and see them making outlandish claims- presenting them as cold hard facts, and never, ever, admitting that their views are highly controversial even amoung their own peers- m
My beef isn’t with intellectually honest publications that present evidences objectively and fairly, it is with those ‘scientists’ that sully the sciences and shape public opinion in an obvious and blatantly biased manner, and it is with folks that post one sided inmformation on forums without ever ceeding the point that there is much controversy within the secular sciences itself, in an attempt to pursuade the general public that there really aren’t very real and insurmountable problems with evolution. My beef is also with folks who consistently attack the character of anyone that would dare question the imaculate conception of evolution instead of addressing the counterpoints in a fair and objkective manner.
Okay, who here believes that, at the very least in the case of PBS, they can expect to get a balanced objective reporting that represents to subject fairly?