Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Scotswife
The fact is, multiple pregnancies are high risk, and they can go bad very suddenly. I wasn't going to allow that, though the fires of hell might beckon.

This person is less than an animal. The children might cause medical difficulties, so let's pick two that we will execute. Never mind that playing God is not for humans. It's much easier to rationalize murder when you can claim some possible health risk or that humans are the highest level of consciousness.

42 posted on 05/08/2007 11:43:07 AM PDT by MovementConservative (Run Fred run.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MovementConservative
The children might cause medical difficulties

The "medical difficulties" that they would have caused involved the death of all 4 babies. With the mother having serious enough complications to require hospitalization at only 15 weeks of pregnancy, there was virtually no chance of all the babies surviving, a large chance that they would all die, and a certainty that any who survived would have serious mental and physical disabilities. It makes no sense to take a large risk of killing all the babies by trying to keep them growing inside a mother whose body couldn't handle this, and therefore couldn't provide adequate nutrition and oxygen to these way pre-viable fetuses, when they had the option of delivering 2 healthy babies instead.

92 posted on 05/08/2007 12:22:39 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson