Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Trys to Set the Record Straight [amid media buzz of falling poll numbers]
Human Events ^ | 05/08/2007 | by Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 05/07/2007 11:30:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

Four days after the first Republican presidential debate and amid media buzz of Rudy Giuliani’s falling poll numbers, Giuliani’s campaign manager and communications director held a conference call for political bloggers on the state of the GOP presidential race. They took the opportunity to respond to concerns raised in traditional and new media about Giuliani’s shrinking lead in the polls, his pro-choice stance, his debate performance and his view of social conservatives. They also tried to drive home a simple message: voters should look at Giuliani’s overall record and his electability in the general election.

Throughout the call the Giuliani team stressed their candidate’s record as Mayor and his conservative record on taxes, spending, crime and even reducing abortions. They argue that voters are fully aware of his liberal social views but may not be aware of his successes in cleaning up New York.

In response to my question as to whether the stampede by states to early primary dates poses any concern, DuHaime noted that it did place a premium on fundraising and “resource allocation.” However, in response to a later question he also indicated that the campaign is pleased with the appearance of Florida, New Jersey, New York and California -- states where the Mayor is running strongly ahead -- to the list of early primary states.

As for the polls, campaign manager Michael DuHaime professed no concern about the narrowing of certain national polls and said that the race has “settled into a place we expected.” He indicated the campaign was pleased with Giuliani’s average 10 percentage point lead in national polls and his “close” standing in early primary states.

After the blogger call a CNN/Opinion Research poll was announced showing Giuliani leading 25-23% over Sen. McCain. The campaign responded to my inquiry as to whether this changed their view of the polls. They answered that this particular poll showed virtually no change from last month which had Giuliani ahead 27-24%. (Fred Thompson was down a statistically insignificant 3% and Gov. Romney showed no change from the last poll.) They also point to polling showing Giuliani is viewed as the best leader of any candidate, Democrat or Republican.

Giuliani’s team was asked on the blogger call about Giuliani’s pro-choice views and his response in the debate last week that it would be “okay” if Roe v. Wade was reversed. DuHaime and Communications Director Katie Levinson laid out their approach: 1) Giuliani is a “straight shooter” and “his positions are his positions” -- perhaps a veiled shot at Romney, who has been dealing with the “flip flop” label; 2) Giuliani offers some common ground with pro-life voters on parental notification and partial birth abortion but remains pro-choice; and 3) Giuliani is banking that the primary will be decided by people evaluating a candidate as “a whole” and recognizes that there are some “single issue voters who won’t vote for him” on this issue.

DuHaime answered a question on Giuliani’s debate performance with a mild endorsement that a “did very well” and seemed to acknowledge the difficulty in getting adequate time for his candidate to shine when 10 candidates clutter the stage.

Questioned about Giuliani’s view of social conservatives and whether the GOP was a “pro-life” party, DuHaime invoked both Ronald Reagan (“someone who agrees with me 80% of the time is not my enemy”) and Sen. Sam Brownback who recently remarked that Giuliani’s pro-choice views were not a disqualifying factor.

Rather than sing the praises of social conservatives, DuHaime turned the question into a platform to argue the “Big Tent” view of the GOP. He cautioned that Republicans should not exclude any group from the party since they are outnumbered nationally by Democrats. DuHaime also used the opportunity to make a pitch, not heard as clearly or strenuously before, that Giuliani is the most electable of the Republican candidates. He listed numerous states including Connecticut, New Jersey, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin which he claimed Giuliani would win in November 2008 and others such as New York where his candidacy would force Democrats to spend money, depleting their resources elsewhere.

Finally when asked about the prospect of Fred Thompson’s campaign, DuHaime gamely welcomed him to the race, suggesting he would make it into the “first tier” of candidates and “take [votes] from all candidates.”

So team Giuliani gives every indication they are settling in for the long fight and gearing up for more debates, more fundraising and one more contender. Indeed, we still have eight months before the first caucus and primary votes are cast, a lifetime in politics.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; giuliani; julieannie; prolife; rockefellergop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Cementjungle
So if it comes down to that choice, should we flip a coin?

That choice can be avoided with by starting a strong push now for a candidate who supports and will not sacrifice core conservative values.
21 posted on 05/08/2007 2:12:42 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
That choice can be avoided with by starting a strong push now for a candidate who supports and will not sacrifice core conservative values.

That goes without saying, but the possibility remains that we could end up with a ticket we didn't prefer.

22 posted on 05/08/2007 2:29:40 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

That only reinforces the point I’ve been making for some time. The Republican party is replacing it’s core conservative principles with socialism. Conservatives need to distinguish themselves now from the socialists by forming their own conservative party.


23 posted on 05/08/2007 2:39:58 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Giuliani is banking that the primary will be decided by people evaluating a candidate as “a whole”...

By my lights, Mayor Giuliani is the sorriest excuse for a Republican candidate that I can remember. I don't understand why he doesn't run as a Democrat; on the whole, it appears to me that his stands accord more with the Democrats than with the Republicans.

24 posted on 05/08/2007 2:44:23 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
amid media buzz of Rudy Giuliani’s falling poll numbers

Poll numbers don't just fall by themselves. They have a lot to do with what comes out of the candidate's mouth. Past and present.

25 posted on 05/08/2007 2:51:35 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
That only reinforces the point I’ve been making for some time. The Republican party is replacing it’s core conservative principles with socialism. Conservatives need to distinguish themselves now from the socialists by forming their own conservative party.

Maybe, but the odds of creating a new party and having it win are pretty slim. At least in the near term. I'm betting my efforts on just trying to get the best candidates we can to go up against the Dems.

26 posted on 05/08/2007 2:54:49 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
CNN:

Giuliani reiterates his support for public funding of abortions.

VIDEO:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZe1j4csMq8&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblog%2Ethevanguard%2Eorg%2Fcategory%2Fchristianity%2F


27 posted on 05/08/2007 3:14:34 AM PDT by XR7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

“Rudy Giuliani’s falling poll numbers”

Is it too late for the Rudymeister to change parties? He keeps bragging about cross-party support. Test the waters in your familiar environment, Rudy.


28 posted on 05/08/2007 4:03:48 AM PDT by wolfcreek (DON'T MESS WITH A NATION IN NEED OF MEDICATION !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I don’t think Rudy has a chance with the right, not just because of his abortion stance, but because of that stance and his stance on the 2nd Amendment.

I still have not figured out how he can claim a woman has a “right” to an abortion but if someone wants to own a gun that’s a privilege and they need to pass a test and get licensed.

If Rudy is going to overlook a right that is explicitly written into the Bill of Rights and the other was thrust upon the country by Judaical decree, what other rights will he overlook and what new "rights" will he find?

29 posted on 05/08/2007 4:19:59 AM PDT by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cricket
.....and don't forget taking a look at Rudy's wife......is she even a Repub; or like Arnold; is Rudy married to a Demrat? If Judy is a Repub, when did she change her registration? ..........

Inquiring minds want to know.......now.

30 posted on 05/08/2007 5:01:21 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Sen. Sam Brownback who recently remarked that Giuliani’s pro-choice views were not a disqualifying factor.

By saying this, Brownback succeeded only in disqualifying himself with me. What a weenie.
31 posted on 05/08/2007 5:12:16 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Election Math For Dummies: GOP รท Rudi = Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"DuHaime invoked both Ronald Reagan (“someone who agrees with me 80% of the time is not my enemy”) and Sen. Sam Brownback who recently remarked that Giuliani’s pro-choice views were not a disqualifying factor."

The Rudy camp sure does like using Reagan's quotes. Amazing since Rudy isn't even close to being a Ronald Reagan in thought or deed.

In the case of the 80% statement, Rudy isn't even 20% conservative, unless they are saying we should elect someone who is 80% liberal. On second thought, given the delusions these liberals live under, they probably do think that.

32 posted on 05/08/2007 5:15:44 AM PDT by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrooney

We won the war in Iraq. The regime is changed.

It’s time the Iraqis fight and sacrifice for the gift of freedom American lives were spent to secure on their behalf. It’s time the Iraqis build their own nation: if its governing regime again becomes hostile toward us, we can again change it with considerably less war investment than is expended in continued patrolling/policing.

Unless Iraqis are willing to secure for themselves and their posterity the blessings of freedom and independence, no amount of bloodshed by others will do it for them. They will continue to fall back into tyranny.


33 posted on 05/08/2007 5:30:39 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
That choice can be avoided with by starting a strong push now for a candidate who supports and will not sacrifice core conservative values.

****************

Exactly right.

34 posted on 05/08/2007 7:29:31 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jedward

” I suppose I should also note that I don’t believe what either one says they’ll do”

Not a word......LMBO!


35 posted on 05/08/2007 11:45:42 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick
I thought it must be a typo but Googled it and indeed the actual title has “trys”.

Proud graduates of our public schools.

36 posted on 05/08/2007 1:33:44 PM PDT by American Quilter (You can't negotiate with people who are dedicated to your destruction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

“Not a word......LMBO!”

lol. It’s just sort of a given. I hate that I even have to note such a thing (shaking head). Good afternoon!


37 posted on 05/08/2007 1:56:40 PM PDT by jedward (Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I thought Rudy's early formula on abortion was to say he'd appoint strict constructionist judges who would overturn Roe and send the issue back to the states where a President wouldn't have to deal with it.

Now, he seems to be backpedaling off that. But, earlier he seemed to support public funding of abortions and now says he favors the Hyde Amendment.

Gotta have a scoreboard to keep track.

38 posted on 05/08/2007 2:02:18 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jedward

Good afternoon, Jedward.


39 posted on 05/08/2007 2:07:07 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
They also tried to drive home a simple message: voters should look at Giuliani’s overall record and his electability in the general election. In other words they know he is a liberal and really has little respect for conservative voters but they think he might be able to win so they want us to disregard our conservative beliefs and vote for him anyway. NO THANKS!
40 posted on 05/08/2007 2:15:47 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson