Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thulldud

“In that case, nothing is relevant”

Non sequitur.

As you pointed out, current meaning is a function of current use, and it’s been about 200 years since it was common for people to use the words “science” and “natural philosophy” interchangeably.


32 posted on 05/08/2007 10:47:10 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: ConsistentLibertarian
Non sequitur.

Hardly.

34 posted on 05/08/2007 11:09:34 AM PDT by thulldud ("Para inglés, oprima el dos.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: ConsistentLibertarian; thulldud
As you pointed out, current meaning is a function of current use, and it’s been about 200 years since it was common for people to use the words “science” and “natural philosophy” interchangeably.

Well 200 years predates Darwin so it isn't surprising there are people that want to turn science back to those days. Pesky facts and the modern scientific method just get in the way of evangelism.

38 posted on 05/09/2007 5:38:49 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson