Posted on 05/06/2007 4:13:05 PM PDT by SkyPilot
There was an almost audible sigh of relief in parts of America's capital this weekend after a TV network said it would not reveal the identities of scores of clients of the alleged "DC madam" because they were not well enough known to be "newsworthy".
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
PING !!!!!!!!
No, they are not in the public domain. The madam turned them (phone records) over to ABC News.
What is keeping the Madame from releasing the names?
Hasn't that been the story all along, that the Madame had been running a prostitution ring, and all these "Johns" were going to be exposed? That has been the gist of the story from the beginning. I think the attorney called their bluff and they backed down like the cowards they are. The attorney may have even had the names of ABC personnel that had been clients.
I agree and it poses a major risk to both national security and what little integrity those public officials may still have.
The ABC Cover Up is a crime that hurts all Americans..
W
“Must be ‘friends’ of ABC on that list ?”
The refusal by the All Bill Clintoon network to release the names probably means there were no significant Repubies in the list and a lot of peace loving rats with household names.
>> (I’m blissfully ignorant of when those occur!) <<
Currently underway, I believe. (October and May).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.