More social engineering nonsense.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Phantom Lord
I see a 14th Amendment case in the making if that happens.
2 posted on
05/06/2007 7:36:07 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Phantom Lord
Lower taxes for women, lower them for people over 55 too. And people in "preferred" professions too, like engineering. And, and and...
It'll never end.
4 posted on
05/06/2007 7:38:16 AM PDT by
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Phantom Lord
But if women earn less, aren’t they already in lower tax brackets?
To: Phantom Lord
Lower tax rates for women would have a number of benefits,... I agree.
Along with EVERYONE else receiving the same break.
Only the "Star and Sickle" would promote equity by taking from those who have for the benefit of those who don't, they're one of the only remaining Communist rags left in our country.
7 posted on
05/06/2007 7:40:49 AM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: Phantom Lord
I’d be in favor of taxing illegal aliens more.
8 posted on
05/06/2007 7:41:12 AM PDT by
Millee
(Tagline free since 10/20/06)
To: Phantom Lord
Hah! I’ve always thought certain “monthly” necessities should be tax deductible. It really adds up over the years! ;-)
9 posted on
05/06/2007 7:42:23 AM PDT by
rhetorica
To: Phantom Lord
Tax them MORE as an incentive to stay home and take care of the kids... instead of dumping them in daycare.
0.5 / sarc
10 posted on
05/06/2007 7:42:26 AM PDT by
Clint Williams
(Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters!)
To: Phantom Lord
Cool I will hire mine, pay her my salary, and pay myself $1 a year. Then we will file separately.
13 posted on
05/06/2007 7:45:42 AM PDT by
GovernmentIsTheProblem
(Capitalism is the economic expression of individual liberty. Pass it on.)
To: Phantom Lord
If you pay tuition to Harvard, you’re helping to fund this insane nonsense.
15 posted on
05/06/2007 7:47:43 AM PDT by
D-Chivas
To: Phantom Lord
lets see... a guy is offered a job for $X and he says no, he is then offered $X+x and takes the job.
a woman is offered the same $X for an identical job in the same department and she takes $X.
WHY should she get a TAX break for that???
16 posted on
05/06/2007 7:48:07 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: Phantom Lord
How about a lower tax rate for only those women deemed “hot” by a board a select men - maybe a panel similar to the guys who make “Man Law”. The really ugly ones pay an extra 10%.
To: Phantom Lord
Why don't we just skip all this incremental nonsense and just add a Constitutional amendment declaring taxes on whiteness (as determined by a panel consisting of the Rev. Al Sharpton and the top 3 black rappers), maleness (because apparently there's a gender spectrum now), and how much one hold's Christian values (because in refusing to recognize one's PC right to murder one's own children, pro-lifers clearly owe everyone else reparations for the emotional trauma that giving some value to life must cause).
20 posted on
05/06/2007 7:50:28 AM PDT by
verum ago
(The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
To: Phantom Lord
Yes, more Marxist social engineering. Let’s make EVERY U.S. citizen pay a flat tax (fair tax, whatever)...I am tired of the Washington pols using confiscatory taxation on the producers in this country, TO BUY VOTES FROM THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO SELL THEIR VOTES for reduced or NO tax liability.
This is BS. It has to be stopped.
24 posted on
05/06/2007 7:53:20 AM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Phantom Lord
Yes, more Marxist social engineering. Let’s make EVERY U.S. citizen pay a flat tax (fair tax, whatever)...I am tired of the Washington pols using confiscatory taxation on the producers in this country, TO BUY VOTES FROM THOSE WHO ARE WILLING TO SELL THEIR VOTES for reduced or NO tax liability.
This is BS. It has to be stopped.
26 posted on
05/06/2007 7:54:54 AM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Phantom Lord
This is such a horrible idea as to be ridiculous. I personally would like lower taxes for everyone. We need to strip the ability of politicians to use taxes for social engineering. It is a corruption that gives them power they do no deserve and have demonstrated they can not use responsibly.
29 posted on
05/06/2007 7:59:00 AM PDT by
Maelstorm
(Great assertions require great empirical proof.)
To: Phantom Lord
the “study” from Harvard also wants to increase taxes for men to make up the difference.
36 posted on
05/06/2007 8:14:31 AM PDT by
kjhm
To: Phantom Lord
Since this is libs who are putting this forward I wonder if this will include the trans-gendered?
After all, we can’t have any discrimination.
So we all just check female. :-)
42 posted on
05/06/2007 8:32:59 AM PDT by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: Phantom Lord
I like this idea. Will put my company in wifes name.
43 posted on
05/06/2007 9:00:09 AM PDT by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: Phantom Lord
The printed tax code today is only 10 stories high. Let’s double it.
44 posted on
05/06/2007 9:03:34 AM PDT by
DManA
To: Phantom Lord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson