Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maica

I can believe Tenet on this one. Im sure Clinton didn’t want to know about such things so Tenet didn’t talk about them, and then he carried over that behavior to President Bush. If so, Tenet blundered. It is further sad that he puts blame on Bush for things that can be attributed to Clinton.


126 posted on 05/06/2007 7:05:13 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Morgan in Denver

I can believe Tenet on this one.

*****

I wonder what was going through President Bush’s mind when he learned what Tenet thought about their daily meetings?!


159 posted on 05/06/2007 7:19:02 AM PDT by maica (America will be a hyperpower that's all hype and no power -- if we do not prevail in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

To: Morgan in Denver

I don’t agree about this being an issue of chain of command. If the Director of the CIA does not have “direct report” relationship with the President then there would not be direct briefings. Yes, its via the NSA, but I can’t conceive of walking into the oval office going over threats and holding back because I haven’t discussed with NSA. That doesn’t make sense.

What is the purpose of the daily morning briefing? To foster direct and open communications. If Tenant thought there were items that required formal NSA oversight/approval/decision then additional joint meetings and/or decision documents could be forwarded.


209 posted on 05/06/2007 7:57:34 AM PDT by sgtyork (Liberalism worthy of the name emphasizes freedom of the individual, democracy and the rule of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson