Posted on 05/05/2007 7:18:57 PM PDT by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
Rather strange that they would put something like this out before their primaries. What are they assuming or implying?
Which will split the Dhimi party, unless hatred of Bush unites them somehow, the Dhims biggest advantage at this point is that Republicans only get a 40% approval rating, the Dhims have a 55%, more people are starting to identify themselves as Dhimicrats.
“Watch an Obama rally. The true libs worship him. Really, really worship him. Hillary won’t make it to the general, but she may make the VP ticket with the apostate.”
It would be a mistake to underestimate the Clinton machine. Somehow, someway, Obama will be taken out of the picture. These people are ruthless. They will destroy friend and foe alike to get what they want.
Obama has no chance of getting near the nomination.
Oh puke puke puke. I have never heard anyone refer to him as that, so I decided to Google it...
Apparently Sean Higgins, a columnist at Investor's Business Daily said it.
It takes more than optimism to make one Reaganesque.
Obama is a fad, a hoola-hoop, a pet rock, Trivial Pursuit. Once people get tired of Obama and his bright white teeth (how DOES a chain-smoker like Obama keep them teeth so white anyway?) they’ll be off on some other fad. I don’t think this oily scumbag Obama will have a very long shelf life, politically.
You forgot to mention the unrecorded years in a madrassa in Indonesia.
Going up against the devil you know is better than going up against the one you dont.The beast has made it so easy for us to defeat her with her own mouth.
This is a joke, right?
What oriface did the lamestream media pull this comment out of?
Incidently, didn't we see a similar article like this a few months ago, where supposedly "republican" voters were being interviewed about how they really like Osama-Obama and would vote to him. It wouldn't be a first time the media uses a retread article.
How about the reverse situation? All of the moonbat liberal males I work with here in the Northeast are talking about voting for McCain or Hagel. Not a mention of Obama or Hillary.
The author seems to think that only the opinions of her fellow media/political insiders count. However, they are not the only ones who get to vote.
80% chance Hillary will win.
Would this be the same “Sarah Baxter”?
A Democrat for Bush
By Sarah Baxter
London Times | October 18, 2004
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15547
Someone upthread mentioned cocaine....it would explain this writer being all over the map - check out a search of her byline:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22by++Sarah+Baxter%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&channel=s&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&start=0&sa=N
Golly, I was disillusioned about W’s handling of the borders. After reading this article, I realize it’s OK to support Obama! < /s
Aren’t the powers-that-be having enough trouble getting the Repub faithful to support our own liberal candidate, I don’t see a huge exodus to Obama in the offing.
Its the drive by media trying to mold public opinion. One of the definitions of independents/moderates is people who have no opinion of their own- who wait for consensus to form and then side with the majority. If these "moderates" can be made to think that majority opinion is favoring Obama then they may be expected follow suit. Straight from the media playbook.
Obama better have a food taster.
Well, if you look at all the time & energy FReepers are spending trashing Giuliani & other Republicans, it’s no wonder.
We need a candidate who will unite the party.
The liberal media is so predictable and pathetic.
ROFLMHO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.