To: John Jorsett
If our math is correct... the CFL will cause 14mg of mercury pollution over its lifetime as compared to 42mg of mercury pollution for an equivalent number of incandescent bulbs It would appear it is not correct.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/ab/CFL_bulb_mercury_use_environment.svg/578px-CFL_bulb_mercury_use_environment.svg.png)
And even this is over stated. In both examples the calculation is based on 100% coal power generation. Coal provides less than half the electrical power in the US. When using realistic numbers for American power generation, the CFL causes more mercury pollution.
62 posted on
05/05/2007 1:25:07 PM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
What is unstated is that the mercury per ton of coal is depenedent on coal location and mine source. Like high sulfur and low sulfur coal, the amount of mercury varies according to what the mine source is.
101 posted on
05/05/2007 3:09:00 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: thackney
The articles assumption that all electricity came from coal was clearly wrong. Thanks for taking an independent look!
167 posted on
05/06/2007 11:55:39 AM PDT by
ChessExpert
(Carbon Dioxide is Green!! It helps trees and plants grow. CO2 for life!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson