But how do they know those byproducts (or similar) never existed before 1935? The truth is they do not know. Therefore the Flavobacterium could have incorporated something that was already inherent in it, but dormant.
This is probably a good example to the bias that is inherent in many a evolutionist based scientist.
But how do they know those byproducts (or similar) never existed before 1935? The truth is they do not know. Therefore the Flavobacterium could have incorporated something that was already Fine, you have your theory and I have mine. PROVE IT.
If you are going to submit an alternate hypothesis, then use the scientific method and PROVE it.