[WorkingClassFilth]

Please explain how this diminishes their value as Presidential timber? Are national leadership issues rooted in origin beliefs?

Let’s all get real and remember there is a larger world beyond the fishbowl of evolutionary dogma - FR threads on this issue notwithstanding.

[gondramB]

>>Please explain how this diminishes their value as Presidential timber? Are national leadership issues rooted in origin beliefs?

Let’s all get real and remember there is a larger world beyond the fishbowl of evolutionary dogma - FR threads on this issue notwithstanding.<<

So much of the strength of the U.S. come from science and engineering. Its the source of our military strength and our healthcare and much of our economy. Someone who flatly rejects evolution doesn’t have the right mindset to be President, IMO. He is either lying to pander or he is genuinely deficient in understanding of the the world. That’s fine is he’s a stockbroker or a salesman etc. Its not fine for the leader of the free world.

I’ve read the words of Jesus over and over and cannot find where we are called to ignore learning or observation. But that’s what’s required to reject basic science.