It’s a bit disturbing to me that there seems to be more animus here for Giuliani than for Hillary.
I don’t see Giuliani winning over the Republican base in the primaries, which means he’s got little chance of winning the nomination. Yet you folks spend inordinate amounts of time on this guy.
Uh, Hillary's not in the Republican primaries. What do you think primaries are for?
I don’t see Giuliani winning over the Republican base in the primaries, which means he’s got little chance of winning the nomination. Yet you folks spend inordinate amounts of time on this guy.
Because people are idiots and they don't know the real story about Rudy. It's up to us to get the word out. People only know of Rudy because of 9/11 and how he cleaned up NYC.
“It’s a bit disturbing to me that there seems to be more animus here for Giuliani than for Hillary.”
That’s because it’s primary campaigning, not general campaigning. There’s a BIG BIG difference. And beyond that, there are many of us whose consciences would never ever allow us to vote for Giuliani. On most positions, Giuliani and Clinton are identical. On a few, he is quite a bit more liberal than she is. That is unacceptable.
I don’t see Giuliani winning over the Republican base in the primaries, which means he’s got little chance of winning the nomination. Yet you folks spend inordinate amounts of time on this guy.
Two counter-points. First, freepers are quite concerned about preventing a Hillary win. Second, that is one main reason we are so opposed to Rudy - if he were to win the nomination, it would split the GOP similar to what happened in 1992.
And finally, Rudy simply is not suitable to be the standard-bearer for the GOP, for so many reasons that have been posted on FR for the last few months.