Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quietolong
'As far as I'm concerned, anything but full compliance is unacceptable,' Rep. Ott said. 'You talk about your personal feelings and violating your rights on this. All I can think about is the selfishness that your position presents. It's very selfish to put the state of Wisconsin at risk because you don't want to have a (premises) number. 'Do you want us to spend money foolishly, going up and down the road to find where these animals are when we could do it more effectively and at a lower cost? You come in here and expect the state of Wisconsin to roll over just because you don't want a premises ID and risk the rest of the state, the economic value, the national and international marketplaces. I think that is wrong. I'm offended that you can't recognize that we're trying to protect you all.' Rep. Barbara Gronemus, D-Whitehall, was the primary sponsor of the premises registration law passed in 2004. She said DATCP staff interpreted the law differently than she intended. 'I made a grave mistake when I assumed that the department of agriculture would be the friend of the farmer when it came to this premises registration (law),' Rep. Gronemus said. 'I never intended to have the department uses premises registration to determine who were going to be the producers of the dairy industry in our state. I never thought that you would use that heavy-handed method that has become a public issue now.' Mark Brothen, a Viroqua dairy farmer, said the mandatory premises registration program supersedes the federal government's voluntary animal-identification program. 'The USDA has indicated that participation in the (National Animal Identification System) is voluntary and that producers can opt not to participate,' Mr. Brothen said. 'This means to me that I cannot be penalized for refusing to place a voluntary premises code on my farm or property.'

Well, who knew that this was an entry point for NAID fascism? For those who aren't familiar with NAID, you better get ready for international control of every animal you own - on a farm or not - including your petdoggs, cats and hamsters (oops, you'll be the caged hamsters).

http://nonais.org/
4 posted on 05/05/2007 5:42:20 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (ought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WorkingClassFilth

Sorry about the mis-spellings and lack of formatting. Coffee hasn’t kicked in yet.


5 posted on 05/05/2007 5:43:21 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (ought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WorkingClassFilth
'Do you want us to spend money foolishly, going up and down the road to find where these animals are when we could do it more effectively and at a lower cost? You come in here and expect the state of Wisconsin to roll over just because you don't want a premises ID and risk the rest of the state, the economic value, the national and international marketplaces. I think that is wrong. I'm offended that you can't recognize that we're trying to protect you all.'

We're from the government and we're here to help.

6 posted on 05/05/2007 5:53:20 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: WorkingClassFilth

Wheen I proposed selling trained fleas in my pet shop NAID wanted a complete report including point of origin (my dog) wholesale price,(2 dog biscuits) name of purchaser, vet certificate, (rejected the flea dip) and more. Animal Rights extremists have gained control of NAID making it an enemy of the people.


9 posted on 05/05/2007 6:25:38 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson