[Wonder Warthog]

"I can't answer your questions, I'm not an expert in all those administrations. Why don't you list some specific examples if you want?"

I only need one--the Kennedys. SURELY you aren't so young and ignorant that you don't know that they were worse than either Clinton or Bush (and still are).

I just know Reagan had no policy like this, but Bush and Clinton both brag about their propensity for this stuff, and it's the whole "all in the family" and "my second cousin twice removed Jed is the chief justice in this town" mentality."

So, having family connections is bad??

"I've had enough of it."

And I've had enough of ignorant, south-bashing Yankees. Since you don't list your home state, I can only assume the last, but I'm certain about the first two.

[starbase]

Your posting style is weak. You said the Kennedys (and others) were "bad", I asked specifically how, and you responded by repeating their name again:

I only need one--the Kennedys.

That's not an example, it's a repetition of your as yet undemonstrated first argument, still undemonstrated, BTW.

Then in the absence of any argument you fall back on the very weak option of personal attack:

SURELY you aren't so young and ignorant

And then you repeat your undemonstrated argument for the third time!:

that you don't know that they were worse than either Clinton or Bush (and still are).

Again, a repetition, not an example.

Then you finish up with a rousing double insult to top off your intellect free, insult dependent "post".

I'm sorry, but your words are boring me. You may have the last word.