Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shooter 2.5

“Give it up. If anyone can tell me how it was done while matching the Zapruder film and the autopsy I might think they are on to something.

All the evidence leads to Oswald and no one else.

I don’t know how Jim Rob can stand turning FR into the National Inquirer”

There is no way that the head shot that killed Kennedy came from behind. Too many eyewitnesses saw that shot.

The autopsy results were tampered with.

Isn’t any National Inquirer to it. Google video has the BBC series spoken of earlier, go watch. Oswald was a patsy.


239 posted on 05/04/2007 10:16:12 PM PDT by swmobuffalo (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: swmobuffalo

Again no facts just a B.S. rebuttal. One eyewitness mistakenly thought the shot came from the knoll. One. Based on Kennedy’s rearward movement. Again, one.

If you view the Zapruder tape and understand trajectories, you can see the effects of a bullet from the rear. Small hole in, large hole, also carrying debris, out. The Zapruder film also shows a two inch FORWARD movement at the moment of impact. NO EYEWITNESS COULD HAVE DETECTED THAT MOVEMENT. NONE.

Stupid, stupid people.


244 posted on 05/04/2007 11:30:20 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson