Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eiyeeclaudius
High standards are good but considering the human factor and the fact that presidential assassinations are (hopefully) once in a lifetime occurrence and people donâ??t always react in the way they are trained, Iâ??d give Occam Razor a better chance than some half dozen wild-eyed conspiracies that pop up of being true.

That’s why there’s erasers atop pencils and spell-check on computers.

But that’s just me.....

194 posted on 05/04/2007 2:48:25 PM PDT by RedMonqey ( The truth is never PC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: RedMonqey
Some of the mistakes were too obvious and inexplicable for my money. The brain is missing for one. Technical problems with the Zapruder film that seems like splicing and reordering of fames. Witnesses not interviewed. The list is too long and critical to all be human error.

Who was managing and overseeing the investigation? Hoover. I don't trust him when it comes to the Kennedys and based upon stories I have heard from retirees. Also, look at LBJ's political carrer. He's not exactly St. Lyndon.

196 posted on 05/04/2007 2:54:09 PM PDT by eiyeeclaudius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson