[okie01]

Odd that the writer would claim there is "evidence" LBJ was behind JFK's assassination, then never identify exactly what that evidence is.

Or, maybe, it's not so odd at all...

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Odd that the writer would claim there is "evidence" LBJ was behind JFK's assassination, then never identify exactly what that evidence is.

1. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

2. It's next to impossible to prove a negative.