Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser
Go back and read those posts, Tant....NNN was complaining because the mod has explicitly ordered the two NOT to post to each other and DU made the first post. Frankly, I think it was unfair to ban one and not the other.

I recused myself from the forum for a day because I felt I was getting too involved (and announced that) and during that time NNN posted to me four times claiming I had broken the agreement, I had not. When I returned, he claimed I was not allowed to respond to his attacks because the “Agreement” was still in force. It was not pretty, and I am not happy with how it turned out.

In order to see how things worked out, you have to look at what I was responding to, not when it appeared chronologically, because coming back, I was playing catch-up, and responded to some posts after we had been told not to (by the clock), but before I had read down to that post.

For my part, I will not second guess the Mods if they want to ban me for something, I will accept that as I am a guest here and they make the rules.

Just make it short before I get FR withdrawal too bad

777 posted on 05/06/2007 9:27:31 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 763 | View Replies ]


To: DelphiUser; greyfoxx39; sevenbak

777 the lucky post (Hah!) was supposed to be to the two of you, but I blew it, and only posted to my self.

I didn’t think either of you was going to answer with out this post, am I Right?


873 posted on 05/06/2007 3:04:25 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson