Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tantiboh

“Your approach appears to be to bludgeon them over the head until they get it. Of course, you neglect the fact that 2.4 rounds to two, and 4.8 rounds to five; so the person that says 2 + 2 = 5 may well simply have more information than you - he’s decided not to exclude the second significant digit.”

I’m trained as an engineer, and now I do multi million dollar deals. If I am doing engineering and I make egregious errors, people could die. If I make such an error in a business transaction, bankruptcy can ensue and people could be forced to the brink of disaster with homes lost.

I find it odd that you would expect me to be less exacting in choosing a president (the current one has acted as executioner of many thousands and lost thousands in battle), or in choosing religious dogma that could risk the very souls of people, than I am in my material affairs.

If so, I have a sure fire design for a 747 that’s only off by 2 + 2 = 5 in the fatigue stress measurements.


2,335 posted on 05/13/2007 1:33:30 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2334 | View Replies ]


To: FastCoyote

Then I suppose you’d better go with 2.4 + 2.4 = 4.8.


2,336 posted on 05/13/2007 4:50:21 PM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2335 | View Replies ]

To: FastCoyote
(the current one has acted as executioner of many thousands and lost thousands in battle)

Executioner?

2,343 posted on 05/13/2007 6:29:32 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Every attempt to make war easy & safe will result in humiliation and disaster.-W. T. Sherman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2335 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson