Replies

And you are not advocating anything? I could go back and find posts on this very thread in which you state you are.

Of course I am advocating. If I were to write a thesis on this subject, you would be foolish to only look at MY evidence. Just like it is foolish to only look at evidence from the LDS apologists. I am simply asking you to read all material facts. But ultimately you will decide.

And I see your tactics used by well you, and other Antis’ Attack, slander, give incomplete or unsubstantiatable facts and attack any rebuttal as being “Typical” or Spin, or SOP.

I've asked you before Delphi, are all who do not support your narrow viewpoint "anti?" It really appears that this is the case.

Your perspective is Coloring you here Color, while I respect your knowledge of specifics your conclusions are unfortunately tainted by your emotions on this.

And you are trying to adbvocate that YOU DON"T have a horse in this race? Come on now Delphi, we are not stoopid nooobs.

Of course I am advocating. If I were to write a thesis on this subject, you would be foolish to only look at MY evidence.

Indeed I would not and have not restricted myself to sources you have referenced in this thread.

Just like it is foolish to only look at evidence from the LDS apologists.

I am not, Google is my friend…

I am simply asking you to read all material facts. But ultimately you will decide.

And when my decision is not liked by you, you make fun and call names?

I've asked you before Delphi, are all who do not support your narrow viewpoint "anti?" It really appears that this is the case.

No, but all who do not agree with me are not intelligent (I just couldn’t resist, no insult but humor intended)

And you are trying to adbvocate that YOU DON"T have a horse in this race? Compared to your team of Arabians, my Shetland just doesn’t count.
CC, BY being for or against the MMM involved or unaware, covering up, or frustrated at the lack of cooperation. Will not affect my testimony one iota. So no, I don’t have a very big horse in this race. I do however want it to be a local thing because that justifies my general belief that everyone deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Come on now Delphi, we are not stoopid nooobs.

FM = Former Mormon, remember?

And it’s spelled n00bs (zeros instead of the o’s)

“Of course I am advocating. If I were to write a thesis on this subject, you would be foolish to only look at MY evidence. Just like it is foolish to only look at evidence from the LDS apologists. I am simply asking you to read all material facts. But ultimately you will decide.”

You’re right, of course, CC. The problem is, when we look at the evidence, then decide that we’re right, your response is that we didn’t look at the evidence.

We disagree. We both have reasons that are logical and sound to us. The difference is, I’m perfectly satisfied to let you keep your viewpoint, without trying to knock it out from under you. I’m just asking for the same privilege in return.