Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JRochelle
Should the Mormons of today have to explain why they hold a man, who most likely was involved in ordering the MMM and who spent years denying it and covering it up, in such high regard?

You know what else I find odd?

1870-71 About this time, Young meets with Lee, Haight, Dame, and others involved in the massacre. Historians suggest that Young singles out Lee to take the blame, confident in the belief that Lee will do as he is told at any trial. Lee is excommunicated.

July 23, 1875
The trial of John Lee opens in the courtroom of Judge Jacob Boreman. Payment for Lee's defense is arranged by Brigham Young. The prosecution's star witness is Philip Klingensmith.

Now, why in the world would Young arrange for paying for the defense of a man he had already excommunicated???

1,283 posted on 05/08/2007 3:02:48 PM PDT by Netizen (If we can't locate/deport illegals, how will we get them to come forward to pay their $3,250 fines?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1231 | View Replies ]


To: Netizen; sevenbak

Did you ever hear what happened to Klingensmith??

Didn’t think so, nobody else has either.

Some say he moved to Nevada....basically disappeared of the face of the earth.

But I know? Seven, that is a clue to some of the information my mother will not allow to see the light of day....but when she passes......


1,288 posted on 05/08/2007 3:24:10 PM PDT by colorcountry (It is wrong to criticize the leaders of the church even if the criticism is true ~Dallin Oaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1283 | View Replies ]

To: Netizen
Now, why in the world would Young arrange for paying for the defense of a man he had already excommunicated???

Because, while he hated the sin, he loved the sinner?
1,311 posted on 05/08/2007 4:20:23 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1283 | View Replies ]

To: Netizen

“Now, why in the world would Young arrange for paying for the defense of a man he had already excommunicated???”

Um, maybe I’m guessing here, but perhaps it was because he was also the governor of the state and the man had a right to council?


1,313 posted on 05/08/2007 4:23:24 PM PDT by tantiboh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson