Ya think? At least since 9/11 I'd say I'm spot on.
Abortion ALONE is FAR more important than the War in Iraq. More Unborn Children in America die EVERY DAY from Abortion than all American Citizens who lost their lives in the 9/11 Attacks.
I don't have to vote for Paul to get a pro-life candidate. There are conservative alternatives that are pro-life and pro-Victory. I want both. I have no interest in terrorists obtaining nukes or other WMDs or attacking and killing our citizens. I also have no interest of Middle Eastern madmen threatening our vital interests.
True Conservatives care about Unborn Children. Perhaps you're not a True Conservative at all -- just a Liberal Interventionist Nation-Builder.
Drop the name-calling. I am pro-life and share every social conservative view. I also support strong foreign policy and interventionalism and the stuff one calls "neoconservatism" with the difference that I wasn't a liberal before. These issues are not mutually exclusive.
And, on the numbers, Illegal Immigration, Gun Control, and Domestic Communism are FAR more important also. Abortion is just the tip of the iceberg.
There is a candidate named Duncan Hunter. He is right on all the issues you mentioned. And he is pro-Victory. No need for defeatist cowards like Ron Paul.
Judging by every single Viewer Reaction Poll to the first GOP Primary Debate, from every available source -- no, there isn't.
Ron Paul is crushing Hunter in Name Recognition, Fundraising, and now Popular Reaction to the first National Debate.
Duncan "porkbarrel" Hunter has never been a strong enough Fiscal Conservative for my liking; and, like it or not, after his first shot at a national audience -- he's "Duncan WHO??"