Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

COURT-ING A DISASTER WITH BASE (Rooty fails abortion test---status in doubt)
NY POST ^ | May 4, 2007 | JOHN PODHORETZ

Posted on 05/04/2007 4:05:09 AM PDT by Liz

.......front-runner Rudy Giuliani may not be the front-runner much longer.........for the most part, his debate performance was lousy. Worse still for him, he was a disaster talking about the very issue he needs to speak most artfully about. That issue, of course, is abortion. Chris Matthews tossed Rudy and the other candidates a softball when he asked what his response would be if he were told that Roe vs. Wade - had been overturned.......All Rudy had to say was that he would believe a constitutional travesty had been overturned and therefore that it would be good day for America. This was a no-brainer. Instead, he offered an answer both intellectually indefensible and politically dense. "It would be OK to repeal it," Rudy said, then quickly added, "It would be OK also if a strict constructionist viewed it as precedent" - the only candidate to say it would be OK. Meaning that he wouldn't mind if Roe were upheld just so long as a conservative justice upheld it. This makes no sense. You either believe a Supreme Court decision should be overturned or you don't. You can't have it both ways. Rudy needs to win the Republican primary, in which the most passionate bloc of voters is pro-life...... His answer last night was insulting to them Rudy did himself harm last night.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: giuliani; liberalgiuliani; liberalrudy; lizhanover; rinogiuliani; rinorudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Alberta's Child

I didn’t see the debate, but from what I’ve read on FR, a lot of observers feel that Rudy did not do well. I have not been a total Rudybot, but willing to consider him. I expected him to do well in debates. If not...

What do you think of Romney?


21 posted on 05/04/2007 4:55:33 AM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Matthews is media representative of who runs the peoples house and the senate as of last November. I really do not have a problem observing how a “conservative” candidate responds to a flaming liberal.

I just am not sure that anyone other than FR and political strategists were even paying attention.

22 posted on 05/04/2007 4:56:23 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

Amen about the moderator. WHY do they do that? Jeeze Louise! WHY!!!!???


23 posted on 05/04/2007 4:57:58 AM PDT by NucSubs (Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I posted this in the debate thread. While I don't mean to spam across multiple threads, I think it fits better here, so I'm going to repost it. Apologies in advance to those that have to read this twice:

The Giuliani Problem

After the debate last night, one has to believe that Rudy has a serious problem with positioning. Forget about who you want to win the primary, and just compare Giuliani to Romney. If you were the type who is willing to vote for Rudy, what would recommend him over Mitt?

"Inevitability / can beat the Dem candidate" - after last night I have more confidence in Romney's ability to win the general than I do in Rudy's. Mitt would completely embarrass Hillary or Obama in a debate.

Fiscal Responsibility - Giuliani's promoters point to his spending restraint while mayor (regardless of whether the facts bear it out); yet, Romney's success in private and public enterprise is clearly superior.

Foreign Policy - neither candidate has any experience in this arena, so it's a push.

Social issues - one can argue with whether Romney's position on abortion has really changed, but Rudy has blatantly stuck with his. I think Romney wins on gun control as well.

Personally, I don't see how Rudy overcomes Romney. That's not to say that Romney will win, but by my reckoning Rudy could very well be boxed out of this race unless he somehow repositions his campaign.
24 posted on 05/04/2007 4:58:59 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts; indylindy; TommyDale
Rudy seemed to have never been asked or thought much about many of the questions and it became difficult for his canned responses to apply to the actual questions.

Rooty flopped at his mission........to finish off conservatives and take the party to where he wanted it, (where he thinks he can win). Note that he did make a weak allusion to winning w/ Dems and Indies.

Rooty was vainly clinging to the RINO's Impossible Dream----to takeover the party by dumping social conservatives off the Repub lifeboat.

Unfortunately the Big Plan was based on the ignorant assumption that conservatives would roll over and play dead.

Ain't happening.

25 posted on 05/04/2007 5:10:19 AM PDT by Liz (Hunter: For some candidates, a conservative constituency is an inconvenience. For me, it is my hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

This was posted on another thread, interesting:

http://newsbusters.org/stories/politico_what_do_you_dislike_about_america.html


26 posted on 05/04/2007 5:10:54 AM PDT by stopem (God Bless the U.S.A the Troops who protect her, and their Commander In Chief !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

You nailed it.. Rudy was terrible last night...he looked very uneasy...Hunter and Gilmore, as supposed “2nd tier” candidates” were the big winners..they both were polished, looked presidential,..showed they belonged. McCain look old, tired..


27 posted on 05/04/2007 5:14:06 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Rudy is a POS!!!!!


28 posted on 05/04/2007 5:14:50 AM PDT by thepresidentsbestfriend (It used to be said that the only good democrat was a _ _ _ d one. But With Rudy and Arnold ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wewereright

What you dont get is this....Rudy told us last night that if elected he will SHOP for the 1 so called conservative judge that will guarantee Roe not be overturned.

Also Rudy is a POS


29 posted on 05/04/2007 5:17:25 AM PDT by thepresidentsbestfriend (It used to be said that the only good democrat was a _ _ _ d one. But With Rudy and Arnold ???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Well said!


30 posted on 05/04/2007 5:17:49 AM PDT by Guenevere (Duncan Hunter for President, 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Liz

_.-*”-._.—._.—._.—._.@!

And you know Flipper
Lives in a world full of Wonder
Flying there under
Under the sea

_.-*”-._.—._.—._.—._.@!


31 posted on 05/04/2007 5:19:43 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

“He was for overturning it before he was against it.

By a matter of seconds.”

LOL

Typical freakin liberal


32 posted on 05/04/2007 5:19:51 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Our Forefathers roared for Liberty, their children now whine for security and safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I thought it interesting that Chrissy, and many of the candidates, spoke of “repealing” Roe v. Wade. At least Rudy used the “overturn” word, not that it makes me want to vote for him.


33 posted on 05/04/2007 5:20:48 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus: "A whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wewereright

Rudy is a Liberal, he has always been a liberal, he will always BE a liberal.

Supporting a Liberal over (more or less) proven conservatives is something I personally (and many here) will not do.

If Rudy is the republican nominee, the republicans will lose their ass in the 2008 election.


34 posted on 05/04/2007 5:24:10 AM PDT by Leatherneck_MT (Our Forefathers roared for Liberty, their children now whine for security and safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Personally I think the last thing you can say about John is that he's delusional, but I agree that he's been a cheerleader. John is less an ideologue and views himself as taking a more practical view of politics. In his eyes he's keeping his focus on winning and worrying about policy as a secondary concern, while we at FR tend to be more ideologically driven and view his take as a "win at any price" attitude.

Apart from being from NYC and knowing Rudy personally, his political priorities jives with supporting Rudy as the strongest candidate to beat the Dems. Now that the Giuliani campaign has begun it's freefall in earnest, we can count on John to propose practical and effective ways to help ensure a win for whoever gets the nod.

I'll admit, he gets on my nerves a little sometimes too because I think policy is more important than victory. But one thing is for sure, and that is that John is a serious guy with a lot of serious thoughts and a damned smart cookie.

I'm glad he's on our side.

35 posted on 05/04/2007 5:25:06 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chickadee
He is articulate and unapologetic about being a conservative.

What a guy! I love that about him.

36 posted on 05/04/2007 5:34:14 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"It would be OK also if a strict constructionist viewed it as precedent"

Like Dred Scott?

37 posted on 05/04/2007 5:35:52 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

38 posted on 05/04/2007 5:39:20 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chickadee

“Agreeing to allow Chris Matthews to moderate the debate? Insanity”.

My thoughts exactly. also ad “Stupid”, “Cowards” and just plain old “Fools”.

The left must just laugh their ass off when they set the same old traps and the Republicans just stomp right in the center with open eye’s and an “Idiots” smile.


39 posted on 05/04/2007 5:41:27 AM PDT by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I wish we hadn’t banned so many Rudy people, it would have been fun to watch them try to explain this. They would have needed all new quotes from Simon and Olson. :-)


40 posted on 05/04/2007 5:48:25 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson