It follows that I don't understand what Auster's problem is.
But that's the reality: the Canada of tomorrow will be built by who shows up. For the sake of multicultural virtue, we decided to outsource the future.
Then instead of recommending some concrete step like ending immigration, Steyn will write, "Nothing much to do about it now except hope the gamble pays off."
So how is Auster's conclusion about Steyn wrong?
Thus Steyn's real message is not the conservative message of defending and restoring one's threatened civilization; it is the liberal message of surrendering to the destruction of one's civilization.