To: jrooney
If Ron Paul had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the inocent at will. No thanks. In view of the fact that Ron Paul voted TO GO TO WAR against Iraq, how can you make such a statement?
To: DreamsofPolycarp
Actually you are quite wrong, he voted against it! Look it up. He wanted a declaration of war declared and when it was not, he votd agaisnt the bill authorizing force against Saddam. No way to spin it!!!
207 posted on
05/04/2007 7:21:31 AM PDT by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: DreamsofPolycarp
I CAN EXPECT A RON PAUL SUPPORTER TO LIE ABOUT HIS WOT RECORD, especially when it comes to the fact he voted to leave Saddam in power to rape and murder the innocent. Here are the the republicans that voted AGAINST the Iraq War Resolution:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002#Republicans_2 -
The following Republican members of the House of Representatives "joined 126 Democrats in voting against the resolution."
Rep. John Duncan (R-Tenn.)
Rep. John Hostettler (R-Ind.)
Rep. Amo Houghton (R-N.Y.)
Rep. Jim Leach (R-Iowa)
Rep. Constance A. Morella (R-Md.)
Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)
What say you now, spreader of falsehoods?
208 posted on
05/04/2007 7:30:00 AM PDT by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson