Skip to comments.
Drudge GOP Debate Poll -- 50,000 votes; Clear Winners are Romney, Giuliani, and RON PAUL
Drudge Report ^
| May 4, 2007
| Orthodox Presbyterian
Posted on 05/03/2007 10:23:46 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 401 next last
To: pissant
Democrat votes may very well explain the high scores for JulieAnnie and Romney.
I was disappointed Hunter didn’t do well, but didn’t actually see the debates.
Thompson (FRED) might have changed everything.
I wonder if he IS going to run.
221
posted on
05/04/2007 7:59:04 AM PDT
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
To: jmc813
Ron Paul doesn’t have a prayer. Thankfully.
222
posted on
05/04/2007 8:00:22 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: jmc813
Ron Paul doesn’t have a prayer. Thankfully.
223
posted on
05/04/2007 8:00:30 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: rlmorel
In the simple test of what is most important right now, Reagan would not be likely to advocate withdrawing troops from Iraq and Afghanistan
I don't agree with you...Reagan wrote of his decision to pull Marines out of the "peacekeeping" mission in Lebanon:
Perhaps we didn't appreciate fully enough the depth of the hatred and the complexity of the problems that made the Middle East such a jungle. Perhaps the idea of a suicide car bomber committing mass murder to gain instant entry to Paradise was so foreign to our own values and consciousness that it did not create in us the concern for the marines' safety that it should have.
In the weeks immediately after the bombing, I believe the last thing that we should do was turn tail and leave. Yet the irrationality of Middle Eastern politics forced us to rethink our policy there. If there would be some rethinking of policy before our men die, we would be a lot better off. If that policy had changed towards more of a neutral position and neutrality, those 241 marines would be alive today.
--Ronald Reagan
224
posted on
05/04/2007 8:01:11 AM PDT
by
Irontank
(Let them revere nothing but religion, morality and liberty -- John Adams)
To: philman_36
225
posted on
05/04/2007 8:01:21 AM PDT
by
bnelson44
(http://www.appealforcourage.org)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I will not apologize because he lied. When Ron Paul had the chance to VOTE TO REMOVE SADDAM, HE VOTED NO! If Paul had his way, Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent!"
What is up for you running to the defense and carrying the water for other freepers that support Paul. My post was not directed at you. You act like a school girl when you do that and are not making ANY INROADS to get more Paul supporters. Please keep up acting like a code pink in your face freeper.
226
posted on
05/04/2007 8:05:17 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
“Wow... 10-20% now? You keep having to adjust your numbers up, as Ron Paul keeps polling higher amongst FReepers. Pardon me, McDonald’s... but I’m LOVING it!”
What were my previous numbers?
227
posted on
05/04/2007 8:05:18 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Democrats are sacrificing civilization for political power)
To: bnelson44
I’m glad you took that in the humorous manner in which it was intended.
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; The_Eaglet; All
"sending our troops to the other side of the world to kill civilians"
The_Eaglet, a Ron Paul supporter, said this last night on this thread and you came to his defense. Please keep it up because it shows the world how some of Paul's supporters are.
229
posted on
05/04/2007 8:14:29 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: jrooney; The_Eaglet
If you intend on Spamming the Thread with MASSIVE size Font Posts, how about this?
In VIOLATION of the stated principles of the 2002 State of the Union Address, "jrooney" believes that the Federal Government should spend American Blood and Treasure to prop up an Islamic Theocracy which deliberately persecutes Christianity and which knowingly and willfully harbors self-confessed and even CONVICTED American-murdering Islamic Terrorists! SERIOUSLY! That's actually what "jrooney" believes the Federal Government should do with our Tax Dollars and our Soldiers' Lives!!
You've made your "BIG FONT" point, now I've made mine. Keep it up, and I'm complaining to the Moderators about you Thread-Spamming.
230
posted on
05/04/2007 8:46:39 AM PDT
by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
To: George W. Bush
But not the Mideast. Reagan bombed Iranian oil platforms.
A few times.
231
posted on
05/04/2007 8:56:34 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(Hey! Quiet Down Out There!)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Sorry there Oxy, not spamming. It is a public forum and I have every right to point out denigration of our troops and falsehoods posted by Paul supporters claiming he voted for the removal of Saddam Hussein, which he clearly did not.
232
posted on
05/04/2007 8:57:00 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: jrooney
He SPONSORED a bill to go to war. He (rightly) voted against a measure “authorizing the use of force” because it is unconstitutional.
You KNOW that is the reason why he did this, so why are you lying about it?
To: Badeye
>and because of it he doesnt have the trust of the powers that be behind the scenes in the GOP.<
Are you saying that you support open borders as does the GOP? Ron Paul want to close them to the illegals.
234
posted on
05/04/2007 9:12:43 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
("Steer clear of entangling alliances with any portion of the foreign world." -George Washington-)
To: DreamsofPolycarp
Ron Paul had a chance to vote to remove Saddam Hussein. He voted no. It does not matter what you say or what you sponsor. It matters how you vote. He voted no. If Paul had his way Saddam would still be in power to rape and murder the innocent. Giving a Kerry explanation does no good either. He had his chance to cast his vote, like everyone else did, and he voted no, not even present, which he could have.
235
posted on
05/04/2007 9:18:39 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Invoke caring about the troops when you defend someone that says are soldiers are killing innocent bystanders. How Kerry of you.
236
posted on
05/04/2007 9:21:10 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: jrooney
Why are you taking all this time to show the world how bad RP is? Are you worried he might get to the top of the poll? The poll which you say is meaningless.
237
posted on
05/04/2007 9:23:53 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
("Steer clear of entangling alliances with any portion of the foreign world." -George Washington-)
To: B4Ranch
“Are you saying that you support open borders as does the GOP?”
Do you see anything remotely close that in any of the almost 3800 posts under my screen name here at FR, or any other political forum for that matter?
(I’ll save you some time, the answer is no)
238
posted on
05/04/2007 9:24:59 AM PDT
by
Badeye
(Hiding the kooks in the biker bar won't help, Sally)
To: B4Ranch
No, I want him exposed for what he and some of his supporters stand for. Ron Paul will not get more than 3% in the race for the republican nomination. Online polls are useless because liberals spam them. What does it say when Liberals want Paul to win the nomination, as much as Libertarians do?
239
posted on
05/04/2007 9:27:04 AM PDT
by
jrooney
(The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
To: Allegra
Reagan bombed Iranian oil platforms. A few times.
And bombed Khaddafi, missing him but killing at least one of his brood of children.
That's not occupation and nation-building.
No points for you. Marque and Reprisal are time-honored American traditions. Ron Paul did in fact introduce legislation to proceed with those as well. Too bad the clueless GOP congresscritters didn't listen. We might still hold a majority if they had done so instead of buying into the liberal internationalist neo-con snake oil, thinking themselves a conglomerate of foreign policy experts. Ron Paul bested them all simply: by relying on the Constitution in every instance.
240
posted on
05/04/2007 9:31:08 AM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(Election Math For Dummies: GOP รท Rudi = Hillary)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 401 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson