I hope you understand that not having a candidate you support really discredits you.
If you don’t have one, what you should be doing is looking for one, going out and supporting/starting one, or just researching all of the current candidates with an open mind. You shouldn’t be specifically focusing on particular candidates, spending your time trying to tear them down.
People suspect you of foul play, because a true ‘undecided’ wouldn’t be so adament against certain candidates. It takes a 10 minute Google search to find out which one of the Republican candidates is most conservative - probably Ron Paul.
Why don’t you support Paul? You probably do, but you’re afraid it will discredit you even further to say so. Or, you’ll support the Constitution Party candidate, but are just too afraid to say so. No reason to be ashamed of that, but you’re making a political calculation that if you named your candidate it would put your ridiculous attack machine in context, and people would start to blow you off.
ROFL...
But you supporting a guy who was the most liberal Governor in America from 2002-2006, but who now disowns his own entire record, brings great credit to your views. Okey-dokey...
If you can show me a FReeper who has done so more consistently than myself, I'd like you to show them to me.
You shouldn’t be specifically focusing on particular candidates, spending your time trying to tear them down.
We always tear down liberals here on FR. That's what we do. Get with the program.
People suspect you of foul play, because a true ‘undecided’ wouldn’t be so adament against certain candidates.
I'm not undecided about Mitt Romney. His record is clearly that of a radical liberal, who now is trying to change his stripes to fool conservatives.
It takes a 10 minute Google search to find out which one of the Republican candidates is most conservative - probably Ron Paul.
You should devote more than ten minutes to learning. It would do you good.
Why don’t you support Paul?
Because, like your "new" Mitt, he wrongheadedly thinks the unalienable right to life is a states' rights issue. And, his nonsupport of the war against Islamic terrorists disqualifies him as well.
You probably do, but you’re afraid it will discredit you even further to say so.
My credit on FR is in fine shape. Your dishonest characterizations don't help yours.
Or, you’ll support the Constitution Party candidate, but are just too afraid to say so.
The only way I'll depart the GOP over this presidential election is if it abandons its principles and becomes the Dem Party Lite.
No reason to be ashamed of that, but you’re making a political calculation that if you named your candidate it would put your ridiculous attack machine in context, and people would start to blow you off.
I find it more than mildly amusing that you would characterize my posts in such a way, considering your inability to deal with the simple facts of Romney's record.