To: Omega Man II; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
2 posted on
05/03/2007 9:04:44 AM PDT by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: All
Wow. Cockburn is about as far left as they come, and he’s crying “The Emperor Has No Clothes!”
Could the tide be turning against this Global Warming fraud?
To: Omega Man II
To: Omega Man II
As the new global religion gains strength, The Goracle will advance to a higher plain of existance. I wonder who the saints of this new faith will be? Will they have Bingo and pot luck dinners?
To: Omega Man II
I realize that many experts believe that global warming caused by human activity is a fact.
Whenever I read or hear the opinions of experts, I am reminded of a quote attributed to Robert Cecil, 3rd Marquis of Salisbury, the last peer to be Prime Minister of Great Britain, which illustrates the dangers of relying on expert opinion.
“If one listens to physicians, nothing is healthy. If one listens to soldiers, nothing is safe. If one listens to clergymen, nothing is innocent.”
12 posted on
05/03/2007 9:28:31 AM PDT by
quadrant
To: Omega Man II
Is Global Warming a Sin?
No, but expelling warm air onto the pews in church might be.
13 posted on
05/03/2007 9:31:49 AM PDT by
irishtenor
(Save the whales. Collect the whole set.)
To: Omega Man II
The left did proclaim after their Gore could not steal an election they had religion tooooooo. Now it seems to be Thou shalt not drive or Thou shalt not use more than one square per privy stop, unless you stop in a Gorism ticket booth to purchase your your pollution ticket.
Wonder what ‘global heaven’ is like????
To: Omega Man II
Is Global Warming a Sin?
No, it’s a SHAM.
To: Omega Man II
Did you see the title of his next article?
Next: Who are the hoaxers, and what are they after?
To: Omega Man II
What a damning article!
The earth isn’t getting warmer because of increased CO2, the earth has increased CO2 because the earth is getting warmer.
19 posted on
05/03/2007 10:19:30 AM PDT by
Rutles4Ever
(Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
To: Omega Man II
23 posted on
05/03/2007 12:13:31 PM PDT by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals Crazy!)
To: Omega Man II
I like the constrast that the author draws between 'Carbon Credits' and the sinful indulgence licences that the Roman Catholic Church sold during the Dark Ages.
What depresses me most about this comparison is that the Roman Catholic Church held the Western world in the grip of their insanity for many centuries; "As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs".
Are we going to have to wait 500 years for our own Martin Luther and his 95 Theses to unburden us from the superstitious yoke of Eco-fanaticism?
If I had lived in the Dark Ages, I wouldn't have been a fearful servile superstitious nitwit nor would I have let the Papists burn me at the stake for being a heretic. Neither do I intend to let the New Age religionist wackos of the militant environmental movement do the same to me in modern times.
To: Omega Man II
Cockburn was staunch in his belief the Clinton’s were guilty of criminal acts in Whitewater but he caved along with the rest when faced with the ultimate power the office of president holds.
25 posted on
05/03/2007 12:19:02 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: Omega Man II
Thanks for the post. Good article.
From the article:
As Hertzberg says, water in the form of oceans, snow, ice cover, clouds and vapor "is overwhelming in the radiative and energy balance between the Earth and the sun.... Carbon dioxide and the greenhouse gases are, by comparison, the equivalent of a few farts in a hurricane." And water is exactly that component of the Earth's heat balance that the global warming computer models fail to account for.
Missing variables. A classic mistake. Every variable you omit, gives a greater role to CO2. They left out the clouds.
The human carbon footprint is of zero consequence amid these huge forces and volumes, not to mention the role of the giant reactor beneath our feet: the Earth's increasingly hot molten core.
This should be interesting when published. A fellow freeper has mentioned the earths core. It stands to reason that its behavior is not constant or understood.
Many articles and comments on FreeRepublic have emphasized the sun. And rightly so. The famed computer models that prove global warming omit the sun too.
So to catalog major omissions / weaknesses of the theory of global warming (ToGW): it omits the sun, the molten core of the earth, and clouds. And there are more omissions. Well, if you leave out all the important stuff, then it must be man-made CO2.
30 posted on
05/04/2007 7:10:28 PM PDT by
ChessExpert
(Mohamed was not a moderate Muslim)
To: Omega Man II
“Is Global Warming a Sin?”
I don’t know that the Sun can be guilty of a sin.
31 posted on
05/04/2007 7:14:13 PM PDT by
unspun
(What do you think? Please think, before you answer.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson