I have posted that the vast majority of lower federal circuit court decisions have stated that the second amendment protects the ability of the states to form a Militia from federal infringement. So far, two have claimed it protects an individual right.
"RP thinks that the Miller decision backs him just because of all the militia references, even though they don’t say that it does apply to milita in the decision."
The Miller court backs no one. They remanded the case to the lower court, asking for clarification. The Miller court implied, however, that only Militia-type weapons are protected by the second amendment.
The Parker decision addresses Miller. It also points out where the 9th circuit was wrong in Silveira.
“The Miller court implied, however, that only Militia-type weapons are protected by the second amendment.”
Only in your mind.