“Hey Sean, what say you? Are you doing the Rupert’s bidding or are you a really a closet RINO ?”
There was a time a year or two ago when if someone made a particularly cogent analysis of something on FR, you’d hear it a day or so later on talk radio.
Okay. How’s this for a cogent analysis:
If Hitlery has such high negative ratings (the latest polls show over half of all Americans refuse to vote for her,) why the heck would you run a Republican against her who agrees with her on most issues?
If people dislike Shrillary because they believe her political positions only last as long as the polls agree, why would you run a Republican against her who has the same inconsistencies?
Run Fred Thompson against the beast. He disagrees with her on almost all of the issues and his positions are based on principle, not on which way the wind blows.
Okay. How’s this for a cogent analysis:
If Hitlery has such high negative ratings (the latest polls show over half of all Americans refuse to vote for her,) why the heck would you run a Republican against her who agrees with her on most issues?
If people dislike Shrillary because they believe her political positions only last as long as the polls agree, why would you run a Republican against her who has the same inconsistencies?
Run Fred Thompson against the beast. He disagrees with her on almost all of the issues and his positions are based on principle, not on which way the political winds blow.