Contrary to more rumors being spread here, I'm not aware of any actions instigated by President Bush to deny us our 2nd amendment rights during either term or when he was governor
Really, then what do you consider the above to be?
If one was pro 2nd amendment, why appoint someone that is clearly a threat to it?
At this point in time, I'd call that an unsubstantiated rumor.
If you can offer a direct link to a statement he made or a document he signed confirming it, I'd call it something else.