To: Milwaukee_Guy
Too little, too late. What if it had been babies dying?
4 posted on
05/01/2007 9:59:05 AM PDT by
CholeraJoe
(I don't give a rat's a$$ where in the world Matt Lauer is.)
To: CholeraJoe
"Too little, too late. What if it had been babies dying?" How do we know that babies aren't dying?
14 posted on
05/01/2007 10:04:28 AM PDT by
blam
To: CholeraJoe
Too little, too late. What if it had been babies dying?They would have acted reacted sooner. Maybe even by last Tuesday.
18 posted on
05/01/2007 10:06:30 AM PDT by
null and void
(The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
To: CholeraJoe
40 posted on
05/01/2007 10:29:12 AM PDT by
huldah1776
(Worthy is the Lamb.)
To: CholeraJoe
What if it had been babies dying?
Probably no change. Blocking free trade wouldn’t be good for the economy. Also we don’t want to upset China. We must proceed cautiously. It’s probably our fault anyway. /sarc off
72 posted on
05/01/2007 11:02:06 AM PDT by
Joan Kerrey
(Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
To: CholeraJoe
Too little, too late. What if it had been babies dying?Maybe this is just a test-run for the real thing.
109 posted on
05/01/2007 11:54:35 AM PDT by
Ignatz
(Did you know that before the internal combustion engine, there was no weather at all?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson