My favorite Tony Campolo sermon was when he said this in a church setting :
“I have three things I’d like to say today. First, while you were sleeping last night, 30,000 kids died of starvation or diseases related to malnutrition. Second, most of you don’t give a shit. What’s worse is that you’re more upset with the fact that I said shit than the fact that 30,000 kids died last night.”
For that matter, why didn’t he just say — “most of you don’t give a f—k”. That would be more colorful, after all, it’s more important for him to get upset that 30,000 kids died than to curse.
Chuck Colson wrote about Tony Campolo in a Breakpoint article once :
http://www.breakpoint.org/listingarticle.asp?ID=2649
What do you get when you hold a conference with 1,200 people who are all afraid of offending one another? Ill tell you what you dont get. You dont get unity, and you dont get agreement on anything.
Thats what happened when the Spiritual Activism Conference took place recently in Washington, D.C. According to the New York Times, this group of religious liberals came together to discuss taking back religion from the conservative Christians. But the conference members had trouble getting anything specific done.
The Times hit it right on the nose when it explained, Turnout at the Spiritual Activism Conference was high, but if the gathering is any indication, the biggest barrier for liberals may be their regard for pluralism: for letting people say what they want, how they want to, and for trying to include everyones priorities rather than choosing two or three issues that could inspire a movement. Never mind even setting policy goals; some conference members were afraid that singing hymns might be enough to upset some members. Instead of coming away with a clear set of objectives, the conference members mostly came away frustrated.
Ironically for a group that prides itself on tolerance, it seems the only thing the conference could agree on was its opposition to the religious right. But frustrating as it was for them, the group had to concede that the religious right is a lot better at getting things done. Beliefnet suggests this was because religious conservatives are willing to argue there is one correct view on policy issues.
You see, thats the crux of the liberals problem. This conflict is not about political or social divisions. Its about authorityspecifically, whether or not Christians are willing to acknowledge that the Bible is our authority.
Tony Campolo certainly recognized this. Though Tony and I disagree on lots of things, I really like Tony. Hes honest, and he loves the Bible. He tried to explain at this conference the necessity of following Scripture. But one participant retorted, I thought this was a spiritual progressives conference. I dont want to play the game of the Bible says this or that, or that we get validation from something other than ourselves.
There you have it. Validation from ourselves simply means you make up your own god. We Christians may interpret the Bible differently; we may apply it to life differently; we may have arguments over exegesis. But the Bible has to be the ultimate authority. Otherwise we end up worshiping the goddess of tolerance and believing that tolerance takes precedence over truth.
Dorothy Sayers, the great English writer, said it best: In the world it is called Tolerance, but in hell it is called Despair, the sin that believes in nothing, cares for nothing, seeks to know nothing, interferes with nothing, enjoys nothing, hates nothing, finds purpose in nothing, lives for nothing, and remains alive because there is nothing for which it will die.
This kind of so-called tolerance can never bring people together, but only as we saw in Washington, pull them farther apart.
Just because some two-bit huckster posing as a preacher says it, doesn't make it so.
Lieberals love to pull numbers from out of their butts.
That quote is typical reactionary rhetoric. Liberals use it all the time. He’d be better off preaching from the Bible than preaching social activism.
Hmmm ... Let me do a little math.
8 hours in a typical sleep night, 1/3 of a 24 hour day. That makes 90,000 dead kids.
365 days in a year. That's 32,850,000 dead kids in a year.
I suspect those numbers are a little exaggerated.