Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
"Either way, Nifong would lose his seat as district attorney."

I heard someone say a few nights ago that in North Carolina, the District Attorney isn't required to have a valid law license. It is only required to practice before the court, not to hold office. Another stupid North Carolina law that needs fixing!

10 posted on 05/01/2007 9:00:54 AM PDT by TommyDale ("Can debate over four hours with no need to call a doctor!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: TommyDale

And rest assured that the Hunt / Easley machine with the Dem controlled legislature, as well as the courts, will only grant Nifong a mild slap on the wrist regardless of how badly he handled the case.


29 posted on 05/01/2007 9:41:57 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: TommyDale
I heard someone say a few nights ago that in North Carolina, the District Attorney isn't required to have a valid law license.

There probably is no law requiring the Prosecuting attorney to be a licensed attorney. But that isn't the entire story. Only the Prosecuting attorney can bring cases to court. His assistants are his agents and have no more authority than he does. So practically speaking he must be licensed to be a prosecuting attorney.

33 posted on 05/01/2007 9:54:56 AM PDT by CharacterCounts (Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson