Stoking violence? What’s Pakistan doing in Kashmir then, a not-so-violent people suddenly in ‘89 turned mad. Likewise with the Sikhs a little earlier. Both issues had heavy Pakistani involvement to the teeth. Both issues are now nearly dead. So, like you mentioned earlier, this present status will, should and can only persist for the considerable future.
As for Bangladesh, even Pakistanis admit to their heavy-handedness for its birth. Nothing India did or should have, would have prevented it, and whatever it did, only hastened its birth. And the Bangladeshis are grateful for it.
The Kashmir independence movement, from all I’e been told by my Kashmiri sources, is sui generis. Thsi you know, too, I believe, but you refuse to understand it.
The Khalistani movement is absolutely self-generating and has no (NO) Pakistani involvement, except for rhetorical support.