If you are going to make the claim, at least you can name something that has missed evolution’s train, or describe what you mean by the phrase.
for the first segment.......I’ll write more later.
One wonders if evolution is true then why are there still monkeys or apes? Now, this is one of the most common claim that non-believers might come up with to challenge Evolution.
I understand that some think that evolution does not teach that humans descended from monkeys; but it states that both have a common ancestor. Well, this is in my opinion a very good cop out and is deceiving.
Evolutionist very conveniently pulls words from the sky, and declare that a new species “evolves” by splintering off from those that are established. Or, certain populations become isolated from the main group and “acquire” differences that remain distinct.
However, this does not hold water. One questions, “How do they know to acquire differences”? This new species that became man has not yet been found and I would submit that the “skulls” found in collections claiming to be a evolution of man are actually primates and not man at all.
Evolution cannot explain in real terms how life got started, some species evolved while others didn’t and others just died out. The ways that Evolution explains often entails long winded explanations and made up processes designed to fit the “explanation” that is needed to support Evolution whether it’s true or not. They use a bait and switch method of avoiding the actual question, but ranting on about how it evolved.