Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Character Flaw
The New Republic ^ | 4/30/07 | Jonathan Chait

Posted on 04/30/2007 12:11:18 PM PDT by Politicalmom

Of all the low points during the Bush administration, perhaps the most surreal was the week in December 2004 when Bernie Kerik was poised to become secretary of Homeland Security. By the traditional measures used to judge qualifications for this sort of job, Kerik was not an ideal candidate. The main points in Kerik's favor were his loyal service to Rudy Giuliani, first as driver for his mayoral campaign, then corrections commissioner, then police commissioner--the last of which was commemorated by the casting of 30 Kerik busts. On the negative side of the ledger were his multiple alleged felonies, including tax evasion and conspiracy to commit wiretapping (currently being investigated by federal prosecutors), and his (also alleged) ties to the DeCavalcante and Gambino crime families.

If a "Sopranos" writer proposed a plotline in which a Kerik-like figure rose through the ranks to become head of the department charged with preventing the next terrorist attack, he would be laughed off the show. So how did it almost happen in real life? The Washington Post recently reconstructed the Kerik nomination: The decisive factor seemed to be that Bush was "lulled by Kerik's swaggering Sept. 11 reputation."

That last sentence is, in many ways, the perfect epigraph for the Bush presidency. The Kerik episode displayed many of the pathologies of modern Republican governance: incompetence, corruption, an obsession with loyalty over traditional qualifications. But it shows with particular clarity Bush's most distinct contribution: the mistaking of macho bluster for strategic acumen.

The error Bush made in judging Kerik is, of course, the same error the country as a whole made in judging Bush. We (or most Americans, anyway) were lulled by the president's swaggering September 11 reputation, by the image of him finding his voice in the rubble of Ground Zero. Of course, it turns out that understanding how to lead the war against terrorism requires more than standing on a pile of rubble and talking tough. A certain level of intellectual depth and curiosity is needed. You not only need to want to kill the bad guys, you need to know which bad guys to kill, and you need to have some kind of plan for what happens after you're left occupying their large, strategically vital, anti-American, ethnically riven failed state.

Alas, Republicans seem to be making the same exact mistake again. Exhibit A is the leading GOP candidate, Giuliani. Republicans love Giuliani, of course, for the same reason they loved Bush: He's a 9/11 tough guy. Recently, GOP consultant Roger Stone explained the basis of Giuliani's appeal to Texas Republicans. "Stylistically, Texans like the Giuliani swagger," Stone told The Wall Street Journal. "He's a tough guy, and Texans like tough guys."

The war on terrorism, boasts Giuliani, "is something I understand better than anyone else running for president." This would be very scary if it were true. In recent weeks, Giuliani mistakenly said that it was unclear whether North Korea was further along toward a nuclear bomb than Iran, casually lumped together Shia Iran and Sunni Al Qaeda, and confessed he didn't know enough about the Bush administration's approach to terrorism detainees to take a position. In fact, Giuliani wasn't even a particularly good terrorism fighter as mayor. A mere six years after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, he decided to locate the city's emergency headquarters in the World Trade Center itself--the one spot in all New York City he knew had been targeted for attack. He also failed to ensure that police and firefighters could communicate with one another, with disastrous results.

But Giuliani isn't really saying he has the most expertise fighting terrorism. (After all, he has never held office beyond the municipal level.) Rather, he's trying to conjure the glow that Bush himself had in the days after September 11. Bush, his adoring fans used to say, "got it." To "get it" meant you had some metaphysical understanding of the war that transcended--indeed, was largely incompatible with--any actual knowledge. To the extent that "it" meant anything specific, it was the understanding that the war on terrorism was a war, not a police action, requiring land invasions of countries like Iraq. Most conservatives have quietly backed away from this particular vision, but the larger notion that the president must be a swaggering tough guy remains.

So, while Giuliani's boast may be absurd by my standards--he thinks he understands the war on terrorism better than, say, Joe Biden?--by Republican standards, it's simply obvious. Giuliani may not have any expertise as a war leader, but he excels at acting like one.

Now, it's perfectly natural to want a charismatic presidential candidate. The trouble is that Republicans seem to have completely lost sight of the difference between the apparent and the real. The reductio ad absurdum of this trend is the burgeoning candidacy of TV star Fred Thompson, who plays the part of a tough prosecutor and alpha male on "Law & Order."

Robert Novak recently noted, approvingly, that "[s]ophisticated social conservative activists" are flocking to Thompson. "Their appreciation of him," wrote Novak, "stems not from his eight years as a U.S. senator from Tennessee but his actor's role as district attorney of Manhattan on Law & Order.'" If this is how sophisticated social conservative activists make their political judgments, I'd hate to see the unsophisticated ones.

Representative Zach Wamp, a Thompson backer, recently said that Thompson is smart to delay his campaign and rely instead on the free publicity of "Law & Order" reruns. "You are able to frame the message and you are not caught up in all the controversy," he said.

The "message" is Thompson's fictional tough-guy persona. The "controversy" is, well, real life. Thompson's most prominent actual legal experience was, in fact, a disaster. As chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in 1997, he dramatically claimed to have found evidence that the Chinese government had bribed the Clinton administration. But, over the course of the hearings, Thompson was able to prove nothing of the sort, and the affair proved a total humiliation.

If Thompson's TV character were a bumbler who brought unfounded charges against innocent people, nobody would be touting him for president. But screwing things up is not an impediment to winning the GOP nomination, as long as it only happens in real life.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; chait; fredthompson; giuliani; giulianitruthfile; jonathanchait
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2007 12:11:19 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jellybean; STARWISE; carlo3b; girlangler; KoRn; Shortstop7; Lunatic Fringe; Darnright; babygene; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Fredipedia v2.26: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference

Please FReepmail jellybean, if you want on/off this list. WARNING: This ping list can often be extremely active.

2 posted on 04/30/2007 12:12:19 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I think this needed a barf alert.


3 posted on 04/30/2007 12:14:20 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Chait is a Chump.


4 posted on 04/30/2007 12:14:42 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Typical RINO hit piece from the New Republic.

Fred

B U M P


5 posted on 04/30/2007 12:15:46 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

These lefties are scared to death of a Thompson candidacy. I love fear in the afternoon (or any other time of day, for that matter) when it comes from the left.


6 posted on 04/30/2007 12:16:20 PM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
GOP consultant Roger Stone explained the basis of Giuliani's appeal to Texas Republicans. "Stylistically, Texans like the Giuliani swagger..."

Some jokes practically write themselves.

7 posted on 04/30/2007 12:16:54 PM PDT by Graymatter (FREDeralist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Jonathan Chait is a smarmy leftist liar and this column is typical Chaitery.

the last of which was commemorated by the casting of 30 Kerik busts

There are commemorative busts of every police commissioner.

Kerik is a corrupt individual, but he did at least do his job efficiently as commissioner while he was enriching himself on the side.

Chait prefers grifters who let criminals run riot, as opposed to grifters who don't.

8 posted on 04/30/2007 12:18:41 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

That’s all we need.....liberals telling us what we want and don’t want in a Pres candidate. They scared of Thompson folks and they DO Not want to face him in the general.


9 posted on 04/30/2007 12:18:56 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

It’s not a RINO hit piece. It’s a liberal hit piece. Some people have RINO on the brain.


10 posted on 04/30/2007 12:19:24 PM PDT by popdonnelly (Our first responsibility is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Well, I guess I should have used this one:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

11 posted on 04/30/2007 12:24:45 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
"Their appreciation of him," wrote Novak, "stems not from his eight years as a U.S. senator from Tennessee but his actor's role as district attorney of Manhattan on Law & Order

I've never seen Law and Order, I can't watch any fiction about attorneys. I do like Fred Thompson because of who he is in real life. I think I'm not alone.

12 posted on 04/30/2007 12:25:00 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Bush trusted Rudy and Rudy is friends with Mafia.


13 posted on 04/30/2007 12:25:12 PM PDT by stockpirate (Al Qaeda is in the United States, they are in the House and Senate, Democrats all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
If Thompson's TV character were a bumbler who brought unfounded charges against innocent people,

Innocent people? Clinton?!? This line would be hilarious if it weren't for the fact that lefties actually think this way.

14 posted on 04/30/2007 12:25:59 PM PDT by The Blitherer ("What the devil is keeping the Yanks?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Admin Moderator

Maybe ask the Mod to add “fear of fred” to the title?:)


15 posted on 04/30/2007 12:28:29 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Run, Fred, Run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Blitherer

FTA: The “controversy” is, well, real life. Thompson’s most prominent actual legal experience was, in fact, a disaster. As chairman of the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in 1997, he dramatically claimed to have found evidence that the Chinese government had bribed the Clinton administration. But, over the course of the hearings, Thompson was able to prove nothing of the sort, and the affair proved a total humiliation.

Help! We’re going to hear about this again and I don’t know any details. What happened here? I am hoping to bring some liberal relatives to Fred’s table and need info.


16 posted on 04/30/2007 12:30:17 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABELER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

“Maybe ask the Mod to add “fear of fred” to the title?:)”

Good idea!


17 posted on 04/30/2007 12:30:59 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! Or Rudy/Hillary if you want to murder conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Well, I guess I should have used this one...

Well, it's a good'n :)!

18 posted on 04/30/2007 12:34:57 PM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Aria
We’re going to hear about this again and I don’t know any details. What happened here?

Go here: http://www.senate.gov/~govt-aff/investig.htm

19 posted on 04/30/2007 12:39:39 PM PDT by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

” If this is how sophisticated social conservative activists make their political judgments, I’d hate to see the unsophisticated ones.”

Condescending twit.


20 posted on 04/30/2007 12:43:09 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson