Pure and simple.
This is an unconstitutional attempt by Ron Paul and his treasonous accomplices to steal the warfighting power from the Executive.
You distortions are quite impure and simply wrong. Paul did not say that the troops' work is not worth sustaining.
You are attempting to attribute something to Paul that he never said.
When he says he doesn't want to pay for that work, what is he saying, exactly?
Your semantic squirming is laughable.
Exactly, and if Ron Paul had been POTUS he had no issues with cheaper and effective means of dealing with such issues.
Now IF Bush had done with this war what is supposed to happen in war our troops would have been home two years ago and Iraq would be in ruins. But Bush is a hypocrite and turned the war from day one into a nation building project instead of a traditional war where the enemy is taken out ASAP at all cost. IF Ron Paul had to take us to war I highly doubt we would have been seeing our troops being abused in such a manner. He would have ordered a quick and precise mission with the elimination of the enemy as the primary military objective and no nation building.